perhaps, but they aren't the ones being arrested atm. seems like that's just your opinion, any facts to back up your accusations?
anyway UEFA would have never given the WC to Qatar which is a mind boggling decision
- Qatar has no football history/heritage.
- Qatar has a negligible fan base
- Summer temps are too hot
- Qatar is not a significant market for any sponsor nor is it a market relevant for the growth/future of football, like China, lndia etc...
- estimated 1200 worker deaths so far who work in deplorable conditions - modern day slavery
The least surprising news; Blatter re-elected.
uh didn't platini vote for qatar...?
Not really, he was voted in by African / Asian nations, most of which will be poorly rated on the nation corruption index.
So the most evil and corrupt sport on the planet shows its true face once again.
Not really, he was voted in by African / Asian nations, most of which will be poorly rated on the nation corruption index.
Because Blatter is the problem? FIFA loses all credibility even if Blatter is completely lilly white, because ultimately he has presided over a corrupt regime that has repeatedly tarnished and ejected individuals from FIFA when they have spoken out against courruption. He's failed to instigate investigations and in the few occasions he has it's been a blatant whitewash (remember the last one? When the guy that wrote it even said it had been changed?) and when the media have reported about all of this he's then attacked the media instead? Even now he's blaming UEFA for everything and implying that the arrests of key FIFA officials is a conspiracy against him.At the end of the day, blatter got elected by means of a democratic process.
Are we going to say that because we didn't get the result we as the minority wanted we will no longer support democracy. Kinda like a kid throwing their toys out of a pram? There were no brown shirts or men with machine guns forcing the voters which way to vote. It seemed like an open and fair election process.
What is more corrupt than trying to oust a democratically elected leader who has support from nearly 65% of all other nations? Why don't we be honest and say we only support the system that gives us a result we want?