Fifa officials including vice president Jeffrey Webb arrested, Blatter getting it at last.

Seats roughly represent electorate size.

As for what it should be, a sensible measure can be created. A good measure could be number of football clubs within the country. I'm sure there are other ideas.

What we have now is absurd. Cayman Islands equals the vote of the USA?

I have no idea what the end result will be. It will however be less corrupt and democratic.

edit:

Proportional representation is an electorate issue where you have tens millions of voters aggregated into a few hundred seats. This isn't relevant to FIFA votes unless you start polling individuals.

Why is everyone so concerned sbout America and it's football? How many clubs does it have, and if you were to do it on a club basis wouldn't they be quite low down the rankings?

Perhaps their relative coefficient would be more appropriate. The only reason ti include usa in any discussions is that they are a wealthy nation but one who has minimal impact on world wide football.
 
I've seen people say that a few times. Why wouldn't they extradite? Is there an applicable exemption in the extradition treaty, assuming it's not deemed politically motivated and there is clear dual criminality? Which article?

Once again can people get some perspective. A VERY common political tactic is to bring up an investigation directly before an election, it puts dirt on the people being 'investigated' but hasn't proven a single thing. You do this literally days before an election for really one reason and one reason alone... you have no case and you're just trying to have an influence on an election. If there was a genuine case it's more likely this would have come months/years ago and simply have had Blatter in jail/out of Fifa long before any elections.

US's Fifa guy is pretty much the single most guilty guy who worked alongside Warner. Us's guy is dodgy, US had a bid, US lost a bid, US is upset and boom, investigation days before an election trying to remove Blatter. No one sees the timing as just slightly dodgy?

Other simple thing to point out is Fifa is made up of members from other federations. The single most corrupt Federation has been Concacaf with Warner and Blazer being the lead most corrupt people. Warner being from T&T and Blazer being the US guy. Blazer helped Warner get elected to Concacaf president and Warner than appointed Blazer his deputy.

Concacaf is controlled by Fifa, they are who Fifa have to work with. Effectively if the US elect Blazer as their representative, he goes to FIfa meetings but away from Fifa his vote is for sale... why are we blaming Blatter rather than the US federation for electing and sticking with Blazer for years?

People who sell their vote who are in Fifa because their areas federations are putting them there, Fifa should investigate and maybe better than they do, but so should every other organisation. Everyone wants to blame Blatter alone while acting like Uefa, the FA and everyone else is innocent and Blatter is randomly going around holding meetings paying off people for their votes. It's perfectly possible he is but why would Nike for instance pay Blatter to then pay other people to buy their votes when they can go direct to people like Warner/Blazer and buy their votes?

Almost everyone involved is corrupt in some way including the FA and Uefa. The issue here is initiating an investigation and making arrests days before an election is an extremely blatant attempt to effect the election.... that itself is corruption. A strong case with clear evidence could have been made 6 months ago with convictions, court cases and leaks about actual evidence made knocking Blatter out of the election process completely. Doing it days before suggests they have little to nothing.
 
Why is everyone so concerned sbout America and it's football? How many clubs does it have, and if you were to do it on a club basis wouldn't they be quite low down the rankings?

Perhaps their relative coefficient would be more appropriate. The only reason ti include usa in any discussions is that they are a wealthy nation but one who has minimal impact on world wide football.

The USA has many clubs simply due to it's high population.

It would not be low on the list.

So using clubs takes both population and the propensity to play football into account.
 
Outstanding news.

Im guessing he was rumbled for something, and took a walk. Hopefully it'll still stick to him, corrupt ****.
 
What a ****.

Why run for re-election then do this a few days after.

I, personally, would guess that he thought that he was above the F.B.I investigation and is finally starting to feel the heat, not to mention sponsors talking of pulling out.
 
What slimy reasoning is he going to come up with? Deny but need to clear my name? I am too much of a distraction in trying to achieve my goals? Health reasons? Personal reasons?
 
Back
Top Bottom