Dunno what to say really.
I think we should Sack Everybody.Even our ******* Physio got himself injured.
+
=
![]()
The physio getting injured was bizarre.
The injury was so bad he had to be taken away on a stretcher.
How did he get injured?
Dunno what to say really.
I think we should Sack Everybody.Even our ******* Physio got himself injured.
+
=
![]()
Well Sterling played the perfect ball to Rooney, set up an unbelievable chance on a plate which no one arrived too and generally caused problems with good link up play. Then was ****ed and gave the ball away a lot![]()
The physio getting injured was bizarre.
The injury was so bad he had to be taken away on a stretcher.
How did he get injured?
His cross was good, and you can't take that away from his performance.
But the problem was his finishing when he went for shots (The thing he's paid to do), he could and should have scored. I think he took 3 shots at least, I can't even remember if he hit the target?
But him not being played in his position is somewhat irrelevant when it came to his finishing, as arguably he'd have been in those exact same positions in his "native" position? I'd perhaps want 2 up front, Sturridge and Rooney, but if we're playing one "striker", it's not going to be Rooney over Sturridge. Which probably is why there's so much "err" over whether or not Rooney should be in the first team.
I agree he's not really a winger, and we have better players to put forward as wingers.
Agree he's not a winger, but that doesn't change his end finishing (Which he'd arguably have been in the same position, had he been playing his native position)
Really? This is a bang average Italian squad and a tactically inept England side.
We'll scrape a win against Costa Rica to go through and he'll make out it's 1966 all over again.
Who passed to Sterling, how far back do we want to give credit![]()
I guarantee if Rooney had played that pass when no one attacked the box, this forum would be full of people saying he passed it to no one.
Who passed to Sterling, how far back do we want to give credit![]()
I guarantee if Rooney had played that pass when no one attacked the box, this forum would be full of people saying he passed it to no one.
I was disappointed with Gerrard too, I know Pirlo was in a better midfield setup, but Gerrard is meant to be doing a similar sort of role and he just doesn't look even 1% as good.![]()
I was disappointed with Gerrard too, I know Pirlo was in a better midfield setup, but Gerrard is meant to be doing a similar sort of role and he just doesn't look even 1% as good.
Still, there were some good aspects to the performance and I think we'll be able to beat Uruguay in the next game. Even if they play Suarez (which is 50/50), he isn't going to be fully fit.
that rooney miss?! my goodness how is that possible?! has rooney caught in world cups what torres has?
If you want your finishers to finish, then put them in their preferred position where they are comfortable. This is common sense.
How can you expect him to play a similar role when playing a different system? Pirlo had 4 other midfielders around him doing his work, Gerrard had 1.
High profile players always attract exaggerated opinions. They're either great or ****.
There's no doubt however that Rooney's causing Hodgson a problem now though, which is a surprise given that Rodgers solved the problem for him 6 months ago.
England just need to play a 4-3-3/4-4-2 diamond like Liverpool were with Rooney (poorly) imitating Suarez.