I don't think anyone was questioning that she'd recovered.
Well firstly the disagreement was with your assertion re: Iran and then leaping from that to declaring that the UK govt has therefore lied.
So has her dad though.
What happened to the policeman? I thought his exposure was "life changing"?
was beginning to feel like extras in groundhog day, or watching fish in the bowl
What "treatment" is it they've had I wonder, given what they've been exposed to?
He was released a while ago wasn't he?
It quite possibly could be, I don't fancy getting exposed to nerve agent like that.
Boris Johnson and May said that ONLY Russia could have produced this nerve agent. As other countries have demonstrated they're capable I asked you what technical or scientific barrier prevented the production of this one, then. If there isn't any - and you endlessly refuse to answer this simple question - then I say it's possible other countries have.
You can say "irrelevant" and "false premise" all day long but you still wont answer this one, very basic question. And you wont answer it because if you do then the only arguments you're left with depend on taking Boris Johnson's word for it. (Who incidentally has now been shown to be lying the other day, which is unfortunate for your position).
He was released, but the implication was his life would never be the same.
He was released, but the implication was his life would never be the same.
The agent caused permanent harm, with effects that included "chronic weakness in his arms, a toxic hepatitis that gave rise to cirrhosis of the liver, epilepsy, spells of severe depression, and an inability to read or concentrate that left him totally disabled and unable to work." He never recovered and died in July 1992 after five years of deteriorating health.
I think they just mean general care, respirators and such. Porton Down said they have no specific antidote and I'm inclined to believe them. I don't think the word "treatment" indicates anything nefarious is going on.
Why not? It's literally the highly skilled/experienced Russian chemical weapons scientist who revealed Novichoks to the west and published the formula explaining why the formula alone isn't harmful because only a select few developed countries would ever be able to make them due to the expertise/resources/experience required.Well he's right that it's unlikely a non-state actor couldn't make these. But I don't accept that only a handful of states could make them.
Okay, quick analogy: I can go into my kitchen, put the kettle on the hob (yes I still use gas, it's cheaper than electric) and boil water, that doesn't mean I'm competent/qualified to design and construct my own steam train in my shed.I also don't see the impossible leap that stops Iran or many other states capable of making these or which makes Iran capable of making these yet "completely lack the ability" to make ones usable as a weapon.
Because I had an interest in the subject before March so I've read things on it other than the surge of clickbait/Twitter/Facebook articles that have sprung up on it, back When Iran first announced they had synthesized the formula I read a number of articles on it which were quite interesting so I had a clear picture of events before the fake news crew started throwing their shade. You see all the clickbait articles that explain "ermahgerd Iran made Novichoks too, anyone can do it!" are simple that, clickbait, they completely misrepresent what Iran did, they never made a viable agent, they never even attempted too, they were merely trying to create the signature to add to the database which (unlike a weaponised agent) did not require it to be stable or effective, just to exist for a fraction of a second in some concentration so it's fingerprint as it were could be recorded.Why do you suppose Iran's are so unstable or unviable?
]Antidotes
Administration of antidotes is a critical step in managing a nerve agent victim; however, this may be difficult to achieve in the Hot Zone, because the antidotes may not be readily available, and procedures or policies for their administration while in the Hot Zone may be lacking. If the military Mark I kits containing autoinjectors are available, they provide the best way to administer the antidotes. One autoinjector automatically delivers 2 mg atropine and the other automatically delivers 600 mg 2-PAM Cl. Otherwise, administer antidotes as described in Table 3.
This is very good. Explains about some science/why they may both recover/things which could have been done to lessen the effects/etc... and also that they’re not as lethal as people assume...
http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-a...sting-why-didn-t-the-skripals-die-on-the-spot
No idea if it’s been posted up until now. Haven’t read all of this garbage thread, if I’m honest.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ve-agent-attack-salisbury-house-a8291571.htmlFate of a cat and guinea pigs considered national security for over 30 days as well. Questions about how they could die of malnourishment and thirst. And why they were destroyed (evidence) not only put down if they didn't test positive for novichok. This just gets better and better.
Britain has a long held reputation as a nation of animal lovers. Until the Tories get in.Concerns over the welfare of Mr Skripal’s pets were raised this week by Moscow.
“Where are the animals, what state are they in? Why has the British side... not mentioned this fact? We are talking about living organisms, and if toxic agents were used then living organisms must have suffered,” foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Wednesday.
A UK government spokesman said: “When a vet was able to access the property, two guinea pigs had sadly died. A cat was also found in a distressed state and a decision was taken by a veterinary surgeon to euthanise the animal to alleviate its suffering. This decision was taken in the best interests of the animal and its welfare.”
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said the cat was found alive but in a distressed state at the house in Salisbury and a decision was taken to euthanise the animal.
“The property in Wiltshire was sealed as part of the police investigation,” a government spokesperson said.
“This decision was taken in the best interests of the animal and its welfare.”