Fowler Vs Anelka

Originally posted by Kronologic
at the end of the day thats what you need in a striker. someone who gets the ball in the back of the net doesnt matter how it is done just that the ball is in the net
Click to expand...

on that basis alone then RVN is better than Henry :p
 
Originally posted by Kronologic
at the end of the day thats what you need in a striker. someone who gets the ball in the back of the net doesnt matter how it is done just that the ball is in the net
Click to expand...

Not at all, he has to be in the right place, be able to take people on etc etc.
 
Originally posted by Kronologic
But what is the point of either of those if you cant score?


and I would say that RVN is better than henry and henry is amasing
Click to expand...

Well setting others up for goals, keeping posession, getting into postition etc. Obviously scoring is very important but not the only thing.
 
Originally posted by Kronologic
But what is the point of either of those if you cant score?


and I would say that RVN is better than henry and henry is amasing
Click to expand...

Just saying someone is a better finisher doesn't mean the other one can't score :rolleyes:. e.g whats the point of being a good finisher if you are too fat to get into position on time, or can't hold on to the ball/pass so give possession away to much or can't head the ball or stray offside all the time etc etc etc. There's more than one facet to being a striker.

EDIT

If i remember rightly Fowler has never really been a consistent scorer of over 15 a season.
 
Originally posted by Kronologic
But what is the point of either of those if you cant score?


and I would say that RVN is better than henry and henry is amasing
Click to expand...

what he meant was that being able to score isnt the only thing, rvn scores a lot coz he is always in the right place

and rvn is NOT better than henry, rvn relys only on good service while henry doesnt and can make his own goals and provides a lot more as well, lets not turn this fowler vs anelka thread into a henry vs rvn thread :p
 
Originally posted by Jazz

and rvn is NOT better than henry, rvn relys only on good service while henry doesnt and can make his own goals and provides a lot more as well, lets not turn this fowler vs anelka thread into a henry vs rvn thread :p
Click to expand...

well I have a n idea lets stop all this one is better than the other nonsense. saying dont turn this into another RVN vrs Henry thread but also using capitals to say rvn is NOT better than henry is only going to make things worse now isn't it Jazz ;)

They are both damn good players and as voted for in that other thing the best two in Europe if not the world. Why dont we just leave it at that.

I am quite happy to leave it at

They are each both brilliant strikers and 2 of the best in the world.
 
Originally posted by Jazz
ok they are both good.................................................but henry is better :p
Click to expand...

ok they are both good strikers...............................................but henry isnt fit to lace RVN's boots

:p
 
Originally posted by Gilly
Spawned from the Transfer Window thread.

My opinions below:

Finishing: Fowler
Speed: Anelka
Control: Fowler
Anticipation: Fowler
Movement: Fowler
Heading: Tied, neither do it often enough
Creativity: Tied, I've noticed that Fowler isn't as greedy as he appears in his time at Leeds and creates quite a bit
Experience: Fowler - This is because although Anelka has spent time at great clubs, including Real madrid, he hardly played for them!

I think Fowler is far superior and I'd much rather have him in my side than Anelka.
Click to expand...

You forgot to add :

TOtal pain in the a** disruption to the team, big headed peon : Anelka
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom