For anyone wondering why these APs cost a lot more than a £50 Linksys, I just spent a total of 15 minutes creating multiple SSIDs on Meraki APs to drop clients onto the same VLAN but with different access depending on their SSID. One SSID is totally unrestricted using WPA2 Enterprise / RADIUS for authentication, another one uses WPA2 PSK for guest access that blocks all access to the LAN so people can only do stuff on the web and rate limited it to a couple Mbps, and another WPA2 PSK which can only talk to the LAN for stuff like scanning terminals etc.
Didn't have to mess around with a VLAN for each type of client, all the magic happens on the AP. Then someone went and put them up on the ceiling and they pulled their configs down and it all worked.
I considered it but in this context guest is people we know that visit now and again as opposed to the public, so a portal just seems cumbersome.
If it was open access with a portal then we'd probably see lots of people around us jump on it, and the internet connection is already terrible without that.
Those ping results are very high. What's the channel utilization look like?
This is what mine is like:
![]()
The Meraki APs have been the only ones to provide reliable 2.4GHz performance in this location. Have used Netgear's higher end stuff, HP. AirPorts worked but didn't support the features we needed.
That's fairly standard for an iOS device that's sleeping (screen off, not streaming music etc). Does it change if you wake it up?
My wife's iPhone 5 is giving me a 96ms average ping, on around 21db signal strength. Any reason why you are using WEP/WPA and not WPA2?