It's funny you should say that since more people in this thread actually find it hard to accept that someone doesn't like the Witcher 3
Everything's fine when people like thegame but the other way round? No way. Don't you find it a bit hypocritical?
Paul_cz called his arguments shallow etc. whereas most of them are actually pretty valid. The combat and movement are both clunky, made me feel like I was playing an indie game. Once you get some witcher gear everything else becomes pointless and it makes exploration somewhat unrewarding.
No matter how creative, the quests do get repetitve after some time and the main storyline after I got to Skellige bored me to the point that I found playing Gwent more rewarding than actually progressing in the game. You get accustomed to the "meet someone, go there, look for clues, kill a monster, await plot twist" scenario pretty soon. I don't think that how a proper RPG game should work
I was so overelevelled at this point, that there was hardly any challenge anyways. I like the game but to say it's perfect is a bit over the top, especially its RPG elements.
I loved The Witcher 2 but the third one is a bit too much to swallow. I tries to do many things but IMO it falls flat where it shouldn't. This will vary frome person to person and I don't see the need to disregard peoples' opinions because they didn't like the game.
If we have to strip everything down to the story, then I might as well read the books again. They're better in that regard anyways.
I, for one, think that the overall polish, interlocking gameplay mechanisms that reward you long into the game, enemies responding to your tactics and recruiting soldiers along with the entire mother base management in MGSV are more enganging than everything I've ever done in the Witcher. But I don't run around and argue with people who say they didn't like it. To each his own.