The physical evidence is vaginal tearing? That's similar to the hyoid, whether voluntary, forced or self-inflicted similar damage can occur.
And the bruising to her body as well, including evidence consistent with her being held down. The state pathologist failed to follow correct procedures - as documented in court - so a lot of evidence was lost.
Lads convos can be pretty crass.
True, and on its own its hardly conclusive but it is part of a picture of a pre-planned gang rape.
Now answer my question, what's up with their version to make it less likely than hers?
A gang rape is a more likely event than two very unlikely events: (1) an ordinary 18 year old girl agreeing to a gang bang with around a dozen strangers, and (2) then making false rape allegations about it.
The boys, of course, don't have "a version" they gave conflicting initial reports, including ones which differ with the DNA findings. And they, unlike her, changed their stories without being subjected to eight hours of interrogation without a lawyer present.