Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 22,184
- Location
- Rollergirl
I have made it clear that there is no requirement for evidence of consent for me to conclude that what the 12 youths did was vile.
I have made it clear that I am saying what the 12 youths did was unacceptable. If you want to continue using the word "wrong" then it's your choice of words, not mine.
I have not claimed she didn't consent, neither have I claimed that she did. It is impossible for me to say whether or not she consented. I said, and I quote, "If she consented and enjoyed the experience then she wouldn't have went to the police to report it as rape".
Prove what? The claim of the boys and the Cypriot Police is that they filmed her without her consent. They then shared a clip online. That's illegal and immoral. What are you asking me to prove?
That the version of events is as you say it was.
Theres no answer to my questions in there. What is it that 12 boys have done which you describe as vile.
Theres no answer to my questions in there. What is it that 12 boys have done which you describe as vile.
This is my personal opinion, based on personal experience. What the dozen young men did was vile, regardless of the young woman's consent. I can empathise more accurately with the men because I am a man, I am heterosexual and I was once their age. I have consumed alcohol and drugs at their age, I have been on lads holidays in Magaluf. I have had sex with strangers I have literally just met in a bar under these conditions. There is no way I would be in a queue with 11 of my friends, waiting for my turn to sexually interact with a drunk teenager, and not question the acceptability of what was going on. My very first thought would be to question the capacity for decision making with regards to the teenager involved. Were drugs and alcohol influencing her judgement? Mental health? This is all on the assumption that the teenager was consenting - if she wasn't, then clearly it's a no brainer.
To be clear; I am saying that these men were not victims and that's regardless of the consent from the teenager involved. It was abuse of a person, abuse of their position and anonymity within a gang of youths. It was taking vile advantage of a situation, and it was unacceptable. They sailed so close to the realms of acceptability that consent could arguably be considered impossible in that situation. They are getting a free pass here, and I'm calling it out.
So you accept that, even if the boys version is true, they behaved illegally and immorally?
Either way we're discussing whether they're guilty of rape or not.
I think the morality of what they did is subjective and irrelevant.
I think the morality of what they did is subjective and irrelevant. As for the legality of recording and sharing the video I'm not sure what the laws of Israel or Cyprus have to say about that. Either way we're discussing whether they're guilty of rape or not.
indeed. this is not a fun thread to keep on top of. some of the views on display are quite disturbing though probably a lot is internet bravado (or at least i hope it is)Clearly, that's not a view shared by everyone in this discussion.
So you accept that, even if the boys version is true, they behaved illegally and immorally?
Hey now, sex isnt just the ladies moment, perhaps the ones who recorded it wanted to keep memories?anyone who thinks their actions, specifically the videoing and 'leaking' of it (her consent or lack thereof to a 12 man rodeo is an aside to this) are anything other than disgusting and vile needs to have a good hard look at themselves, or stop typing bs on the internet.
You completely ignore theirs but hold value to hers?Throw in the total lack of counter evidence beyond a dodgy "confession",
But that wasn't they were on trial for, there could be a follow-up trial on that, but in the meantime concentrate on the question at hand.
Still waiting on an answer to mine...There is no question at hand, it's an open discussion.
Still waiting on an answer to mine...
Catch yourself on.Hey now, sex isnt just the ladies moment, perhaps the ones who recorded it wanted to keep memories?