Gang of 12 'allegedly' rape British Citizen in Cyprus

What else could it be? As videos of consensual sex only show a video of consensual sex. I don't get why they mean anything else?

Also, weak sauce.

It could be that they're casting doubt on the certainty many in here have that she was raped.
 
It could be that they're casting doubt on the certainty many in here have that she was raped.
Nice spin, at least you didn't use the kind of language as the other people suggesting such.

Anyway, here we get to the crutch.... there seems to be a suggestion that folk are saying she was deffo not raped, with the other side saying she deffo was, based on things that do not 100% suggest either way.

It seems to me that its mainly one side saying, now hold on! none of that stuff means she was deffo not raped, she still could have been. And it looks like there was a perversion of justice somewhere here, it should have gone to court.

While the other (who have used big misogynistic language) saying deffo crazy woman who wanted it and lied.

It's weird.
 
You're still just claiming tthe Cypriot Police are wrong about the existing clips.

Nope, I've not made that claim. I'm stating that you're wrong to say that there is only one clip and that it is the one you described. Please do link to where the Cypriot police have stated there is only one video clip if you're going to try and extend this to me supposedly saying they're wrong too.

There are only two possibilities here: (1) that the clips you claim prove she had consensual group sex are not of her; or (2) that you, ace internet Sleuth Dowie, discovered key evidence in the case overlooked by the Cypriot Police.

Or you got it wrong...

Anyway - go for it, what is the basis for your claim?

The other possibility is that the clips distributed are small clips taken from a longer one.
 
Last edited:
gqJ52BB.gif


NamKgUVm.jpg

If you really want then you're welcome to send me a trust and I'll give you the name from a throwaway/fake account - you can figure out the rest yourself re: accessing the two short clips etc... any pictures of her face etc..etc.. Or you could have just dropped a message to the mods if you'd wanted to have permission for it to be posted here.

I'll await your mail.
 
^^ he sent you a trust already, so you can eaisily get access to his email, then all you have to do is send what he has asked for from a throwaway email address. I don't see the problem, unless it does contain underage stuff? If so yer probably fekked already :p
 
^^ he sent you a trust already, so you can eaisily get access to his email, then all you have to do is send what he has asked for from a throwaway email address. I don't see the problem, unless it does contain underage stuff? If so yer probably fekked already :p

He hasn't sent me a trust message yet, he's just posted a silly screen shot pretending he has... thus me saying send me a trust message and I'll send him the name. Or just ask the mods re: the name... or just use google himself and find the name... he's the one banging on about it. AFAIK she's over 18 and so is the boyfriend... there might be other short clips the Cypriot police had but what has been described in the press isn't in the two that have circulated so far.

I thought the argument being put forward was that, because there is a video showing what appears to be her being a part of consensual acts of a sexual nature, that meant that there was no way she could have been raped at another time because she is an up for it ***t?

No the argument, which has already been presented to you, is that she's made a statement which has seemingly come undone when it has later emerged that some of the apparent suspects had strong alibis and the police had viewed videos of the sexual acts which took place...
 
^^ to which you have already been told that she only accused one of them (as a fully known)... the rest were put forward by the accused and by the police?


He hasn't sent me a trust message yet

So, is there a stand off where neither one of you wants the other to know their email address? I thought he said he had sent one, but it seems like he was asking you to make the first move...
 
Also, I notice you've not managed a single verifiable, salient, fact not reported by the UK press. You're still just claiming tthe Cypriot Police are wrong about the existing clips.

There are only two possibilities here: (1) that the clips you claim prove she had consensual group sex are not of her; or (2) that you, ace internet Sleuth Dowie, discovered key evidence in the case overlooked by the Cypriot Police.

I shall leave readers to decide which is more likely.

In hindsight it looks like they are fake. The room changes colour as does the headboard in the 3 vids. Ive also possibly found out her real name and it doesn't look like the same girl in the video.
I take back what I said.
 
Nope, I've not made that claim. I'm stating that you're wrong to say that there is only one clip and that it is the one you described. Please do link to where the Cypriot police have stated there is only one video clip if you're going to try and extend this to me supposedly saying they're wrong too.

You have claimed that the video evidence demonstrates she is lying. How exactly does it do that if doesn't show consensual group sex?

Oh, and you've got it wrong - again - I said that the Cypriot Police confirmed that there was no clip demonstrating consensual group sex (confirmed here by the Defence lawyer). I've also claimed that the only confirmed clip is the one I described. Please post a source if you have another?

The other possibility is that the clips distributed are small clips taken from a longer one.

A clip taken from a longer clip that doesn't show consensual group sex can't show consensual group sex now, can it?

3rd time of asking: name a single validated, salient, fact not given in the UK press?
 
In hindsight it looks like they are fake. The room changes colour as does the headboard in the 3 vids. Ive also possibly found out her real name and it doesn't look like the same girl in the video.
I take back what I said.

Thank you.
 
@Mr Jack

Try to make use of the quote function.... re: group sex - I've replied to that already:

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/33276686/

re the claim I objected to:

There is a clip that shows her having consensual sex with one boy before telling him to get his friends out of the room. That's the only real clip.

That is false, not the existence of that clip but your assertion that it is the only real clip. In fact that clip doesn’t even appear to be circulated.

you've then jumped from that to some claim that I'm disputing what the Cypriot police have said.... this is false to, I've not mentioned anything about disputing what the Cypriot police have said... you're now diverting to some claim about group sex....

Pls try again, read posts carefully (including what they're in response to) and use the quote function.
 
^^ could that be because he is talking about video the police used, and you are talking about video the police didnt use (for whatever reason, but most likely because they are probably fake?) (also hence his reaction of you suggesting by proxy that the police are wrong)
 
@dowie

You've made many claims over the many pages of this thread, repeatedly claiming that the video evidence is against her. It is that I am discussing. Do you now want to withdraw that claim since you're apparently totally unable to defend it?

4th time of asking: name a single validated, salient, fact not mentioned in the UK media?
 
^^ could that be because he is talking about video the police used, and you are talking about video the police didnt use (for whatever reason, but most likely because they are probably fake?) (also hence his reaction of you suggesting by proxy that the police are wrong)

No it just seems that he's focused on one clip mentioned by the police and has then made some dubious claim that it is the only one.
 
@dowie

You've made many claims over the many pages of this thread, repeatedly claiming that the video evidence is against her. It is that I am discussing. Do you now want to withdraw that claim since you're apparently totally unable to defend it?

Are you going to back up the claim you made - quoted again above...

if you want clarification of something I've posted then use the quote function - this is in part because you're seemingly deliberately conflating different things and making claims I've not made such as supposedly disputing what the Cypriot police have said etc..

Why not back up your claim and or clarify exactly what you're referring to with regards to what I've posted instead of wasting more time with pointless back and forth?

4th time of asking: name a single validated, salient, fact not mentioned in the UK media?

I'll get back to this later - lets clear up the other claim first instead of diverting.
 
No it just seems that he's focused on one clip mentioned by the police and has then made some dubious claim that it is the only one.

^^ becaue it is the only one used by the police.....? Why would he talk about other ones that have no validity? So much so that they were not used by them? Still not seeing any proof that there are more, except ones that folk are saying are fakes...


It's as if you are turning on and off your capability to uderstand someone, instead of simply understanding them.
 
^^ becaue it is the only one used by the police.....? Why would he talk about other ones that have no validity? So much so that they were not used by them? Still not seeing any proof that there are more, except ones that folk are saying are fakes...

Source? (re claim there is only one video clip used by the police)
 
^^ You'll have to ask him, as I'm saying what he said to try get you to understand what is being said in the first place...

I understood what he said, I'm asking him to back it up instead of wasting further posts... you've then jumped in to seemingly make the same claim and now apparently that was just an explanation... well it's rather pointless. So far @Mr Jack hasn't backed up the claim he made.
 
Back
Top Bottom