And the 690's even worst! £800 for 2gb pssssssttt!!
lol
The only good thing about it is I have never run out of vram @1600p using two of them in sli
Having said that I would never recommend one to someone using 5760 x 1080.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
And the 690's even worst! £800 for 2gb pssssssttt!!
You get 3GB with a £200 7950...
Only 3GB on a £500 card is a ripoff.
Maybe but you're looking at it too simplistically. It's not just as simple as having more, it's having the grunt to push playable frame rates which actually exceed said VRAM limit.
Wow
What games are you playing to do that
It doesn't matter, 3GB for £500 is a ripoff.
You get 3GB with a £200 7950...
Only 3GB on a £500 card is a ripoff.
Still very poor for a £500+ card.
Totally ridiculous. Over £500 and not even 4GB of VRAM.
Only 3GB, that's really really poor.
It's very very poor IMO.
Any card over £400 ought to be 4GB at least.
You will be buying 2 for SLI then?
You will be buying 2 for SLI then?
You would have thought the world was ending from those responses!!
LOL brilliant. I was sure I'd read the same thing multiple times from the same person. Glad somebody dug them out .
Kudos for behind a spoiler as well. It made it even more enjoyable to read.
Wow
What games are you playing to do that
Max Payne 3 destroyed 2GB of VRam on Max settings and that was a year ago.
Personally at 2560x1440 with all settings maxed (Except MSAA, which is at MSAAx4) and Windows 7 aero disabled, highest I have seen is 1.8GB, as you can see 2GB is plenty even at 2560x1440.
I'm impressed at how well optimized this game is, I have yet to see it below 150fps, and this is at 2560x1440 with all settings maxed.
If you play at 1080p/1200p then 2GB is plenty for max settings, if you play at 2560x1440 or 2560x1600 then you will not be able to run MSAAx8, but I'm playing it maxed details with MSAAx4 and it's smooth as butter.
Confirmed, seems like MSAA is a huge vram hog in this game. I play at 2560x1440 max settings Windows 7 aero disabled, with MSAAx4 I would see up to 1.89GB of vram usage, with MSAAx2 highest I have seen in the same place is 1.1GB.
I guess I'll stick to MSAAx2, I see no difference at all at this resolution between MSAAx2 and MSAAx8.
It isn't like it is compulsory to buy one. All that ranting, you would think there are no other alternatives. I have not seen that amount of rage since the Poll Tax was introduced...
You genuinely think that's rage and ranting?
Bet i can guess of one place.......Price leaked in Euro's now, €599 = £500, plus tax and hike...
My final guess is £550 launch price average. With some places charging even more lol.
You genuinely care what I think?