The way I've seen some people reacting to this online is worrying and quite hilarious... a lot seem to think that the RTX card now indicates the gaming GTX cards will be Turing and only slightly less powerful than this, which is absurd. There's a reason they didn't mention Volta ONCE during that event, and I think it's obviously because the gaming GPU's will be using it. If they exclaimed how much faster Turing was than Volta (which they easily could have done), it would then look remarkably silly when they start saying how amazing Volta is next week at Gamescom, which is why they focused on Pascal instead... a really daft comparison when you think about it given it had none of the tech of the new RTX card... tensor cores, ray tracing etc. Volta would have been the obvious comparison, but they deliberately chose to ignore it.
Seems obvious to me now (as it has done all along) that we're getting Volta in the 11xx/20xx series. I think there's going to be some serious butthurt from some fans when they don't get Turing now though.
Seems obvious to me now (as it has done all along) that we're getting Volta in the 11xx/20xx series. I think there's going to be some serious butthurt from some fans when they don't get Turing now though.
Last edited: