1080ti is the sensible option isn't it. But if I'm upgrading then Im tempted to waste more money than a need to go 2080ti.
Such a shame the 2080 is so disappointing.
Sound's like you have already made up your mind.. 2080Ti it is then
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
1080ti is the sensible option isn't it. But if I'm upgrading then Im tempted to waste more money than a need to go 2080ti.
Such a shame the 2080 is so disappointing.
1080ti is the sensible option isn't it. But if I'm upgrading then Im tempted to waste more money than a need to go 2080ti.
Such a shame the 2080 is so disappointing.
Nope, it's on par with a blower for GPU temps and noise. That basically means there's zero reason to buy it (as previously the only reasons were the blower cooler and earlier launch compared to AIB, neither of which this now has).What on earth are you babbling about? The RTX FE cooler is great and better than the pascal FE cards in every possible way.
You weren't alone. A lot had fps issues with COD4.
The fov must be sweet with those games though.
Most of the major reviewers have said it's either not worth the money (I.E Linus/GN) or simply do not buy it (I.E Jayz).But they didn't?
Its either a 1080Ti or a 2080Ti i would go for. 2080Ti if you can stomach the cost knowing you will be getting the most performance, ray tracing and DLSS when they release it.
1080Ti to 980Ti is no small feat either 60-70%ish so a 2080Ti will be twice as fast without DLSS possible thrice as fast with DLSS
I want more from my 3440 x 1440 UW than what my 980ti gives me but not sure whether to go 1080ti or 2080ti. 2080 was an option until the benchmarks were release.
If he can get one cheaply then i'd agree. 1080Ti beats the 2080 in pretty much everything once both are fully overclocked.
Performance is pretty good. Pricing is awful.
If the 2080 was ~£550 at launch like the 1080 and the 2080ti was more like £750 i think we would all be pretty happy with the 2xxx series.
As it happens ~£800 for a 2080 is lol money, and is Nvidia simply taking advantage of zero competition.
Nope, it's on par with a blower for GPU temps and noise. That basically means there's zero reason to buy it (as previously the only reasons were the blower cooler and earlier launch compared to AIB, neither of which this now has).
NB: For anyone interested it's because there are almost no openings for the air to actually escape, meaning it can hit 80c on a test bench nevermind in a case.
1. It’s £715 for a 2080
2.1080 was never £550 at launch as far as I recall at least for the partner cards. As far as memory serves I immediately preordered 2 x EVGA FTW (SHAME preorder SHAME) which as it transpired saved me a fortune because £ vs $ took a nose dive and @Gibbo honoured all the lucky preorders at a loss (legend). The 1080 was probably the same price due to that and low stock for a long time.
You’re only moaning because the 1080ti was surprisingly good value for its Titan performance... and let’s not even go there with Titan V.
The 2080 maintains 100fps in nearly every game at Ultra settings @ 3440x1440p. Hardly disappointing.
Same here, EVGA GTX 1080 Superclock pre ordered on launch for £560 (though I got an additional 5% student discount )What? You dont recall correctly then. I had a Gigiabyte G1 gaming on pre order for £559.99. I have the order details right in front of me now. There were also standard blower cards available for less than that.
Same here, EVGA GTX 1080 Superclock pre ordered on launch for £560 (though I got an additional 5% student discount )