He was proved right, did you not read that? just shows what a shop gets for minimum wage these days![]()
Any source for this claim?
He was proved right, did you not read that? just shows what a shop gets for minimum wage these days![]()
Ironically Nige didn't have anything to complain about in 2010 when he was doing well and Labour were getting a hiding:
![]()
It's almost like public opinion affects how members of the public feel :O
ci_newman @ Err yes you must have missed the last 6 times it have been posted![]()
I'll just leave this here -> http://www.theguardian.com/politics...idate-suspended-threatening-bullet-tory-rival
I went to school with Ranil, he was born in Britain, educated by the British state-schooling system and works in Britain. How much more do you need to do to be considered British??![]()
You mean in 2010 when UKIP wasn't a threat to Lib/Lab/Con? Shocking!
You mean in 2010 when UKIP wasn't a threat to Lib/Lab/Con? Shocking!
if the BBC was truly biased, they wouldn't keep booking him onto the show. The BBC has given Farage a disproportionately large voice through Question Time.
You can spin it how you like, but one thing I was taught in history was to always analyze the source of data.
There is an argument to banning all links from the Daily Mail and the Guardian on this thread.
I've explained this before, the reason they kept inviting them on what try to do the same to him as what they did to Nick Griffin and discredit him, what happened instead is that people saw that he wasn't the BNP v2.0 and started to gain popularity. That's when the BBC turned on him in a massive way.
Suppose people have seen this days ago?
Sky News latest take…
That still doesn't explain why UKIP are only polling between 13% - 15%, you would think with that exposure / free publicity he would be making tides.
Or is it that a large proportion of the electorate do not agree with what UKIP stand for.
That still doesn't explain why UKIP are only polling between 13% - 15%, you would think with that exposure / free publicity he would be making tides.
Or is it that a large proportion of the electorate do not agree with what UKIP stand for or think they are capable of running the country
It's YouGov, I appreciate if you're feeling pedantic you might want to examine the questions in detail, but your implication was you didn't trust the result and wanted to examine it for possible errors. It would have been more gracious (less telling of your bias) to just accept the findings - that UKIP supporters are on average more racially prejudiced or outright racist. Are you genuinely surprised by this, really?