Theres no difference, you are mutilating a childs ear (body) without thier consent.
Would appearence be classed as a good reason?
Are we really going to sit and pretend a little girl asking to have her ears pierced is the same as cutting the foreskin off of a baby as a religious ritual? Really?
Oh well, if it's common in America, it must be fine.
The risk is not nil. There is ALWAYS a chance for something to go wrong. Some undiagnosed thing to rear its ugly head and cause complications. The risk is low, but it's not zero.
There's risk in getting a vaccine jabs, should we stop them?
I have a scar on my shoulder from a vaccine jab as a child, i dont like it and i was given no choice. Should we ban these as well as i had no made a decision if i wanted it or not?
I agree with you, but piercings are essentially reversible. Good luck growing your foreskin back.
There's risk in getting a vaccine jabs, should we stop them?
I have a scar on my shoulder from a vaccine jab as a child, i dont like it and i was given no choice. Should we ban these as well as i had no made a decision if i wanted it or not?
There's risk in getting a vaccine jabs, should we stop them?
I have a scar on my shoulder from a vaccine jab as a child, i dont like it and i was given no choice. Should we ban these as well as i had no made a decision if i wanted it or not?
I've said I'm against both. I was just saying there's a difference between cutting off a foreskin and someone having a piercing - the former being permanent, the latter leaving a tiny, usually imperceptible mark at most. That's not to say the latter's okay, just that the former's worse.
Nope... It is a good idea. Does not even hurt.
Are you going to explain why you think circumcision of children is a good idea?
Nope, but ...... yes.... nope.... but.....
In your opinion, in my opinion i find piercings worse.
Does your jab benefit you? Yes.
Is the effect incredibly minor? Yes.
Does it ever negatively effect how your body performs? No.
The answers are all opposite for circumcision. It is a much more drastic change.
Does it really matter if its reversible, its still mutilation without consent and it causes unnecessary pain. A hole in your ear is mutilation if going by the criteria of circumcision is mutilation.
Not sure if serious or just trolling.
Does it really matter if its reversible, its still mutilation without consent and it causes unnecessary pain. A hole in your ear is mutilation if going by the criteria of circumcision is mutilation.
Does your circumsition benefit you? Yes.
Is the effect incredibly minor? Yes.
Does it ever negatively effect how your body performs? No.
actually a hole in your ear heals up very quickly. Still don't agree with it on children either, but it's a damn sight less worse than irreversibly cutting of the skin on the stop of the penis.
LOL.
Anyway, regardless of how I rank them... I think both are unjustifiable... whereas you're justifying mutilation of a small child, because an old book says so. Brilliant. I hope history judges you harshly.