Of the two, I'm more interested in Ghostbusters.
Same
Of the two, I'm more interested in Ghostbusters.
In the movies ecto-1 and 1A are meant to be separate vehicles. It's mentioned in the novel I think. I think there is even a scene in GB2 with the original licence plate visible.
Aye, he seems to think its the original...which it's not. That's either ecto 1a or another car they had assembled for the movie. They had the original done up several years ago and it cost quite a lot, whereas 1a was in the sony backlot rotting, so makes sense they would use it considering the sorry state it was in. Had parts taken from it by souvenir hunters, some parts were used for the ecto 1 restoration, a van apparently collided with it and caused a lot of damage in the first pic..
It's been confirmed that the ecto seen in the new film was the 1A that has been restored. Although there are a couple of different cars used in the new film.
Adam got access to Phoebe's hero proton pack from Afterlife. Of course he did... I'm not jealous... Nope... Not at all.
Have a gallery of 117 photos - https://www.tested.com/culture/ghostbusters-afterlife-proton-pack-prop-photos/
Oh, and he's built his own take on Egon's pack as well
Interesting to look at, wonder what the rest of the packs look like in comparison as the focus mainly seems to be on the spengler pack. Mad that they even reference that scene from the first movie in the elevator with the non existant power on button.
Was thinking of getting an aluminium wand myself, pricey though
The Guardian said:It’s pandering all the way down.........
the original Ghostbusters, a crude-ish comedy featuring Saturday Night Live alumni doing sci-fi-flavored shtick..........
attendees voiced their high-decibel approval for what they saw as the true draw of this misbegotten project........
His son Jason....... aspires to little more than this deadened "rat-pulls-lever" pleasure of recognition.........
a nostalgia object, drained of personality and fitted into a dully palatable mold, custom-made for a fandom that worships everything and respects nothing.........
@bazzabear I very much doubt they'd be able to find someone who would be willing to say they enjoyed the original that actually works at The Guardian
From my limited understanding the paper mostly appears to be written by, and seemingly written for, people who find it enjoyable to look down upon and even sneer at all the peasant scum who are obviously beneath them, as the staff are clearly vastly intellectually superior to that riff-raff and therefore they rage against the unfairness and indignity of being controlled/led/managed by inferior plebs who've stolen their position of power, when it should be them who are rightfully in charge.
Well thats just my own bias though, having had 3 Guardian readers as middle-management with that exact attitude, your mileage may vary