Gigabyte seem to be saying that they had no communication from OCUK, that they didn't receive the item from OCUK (where as OCUK told the customer it had been back to them twice) and that the item was damaged by OCUK (or from improper shipping by them). Would be interesting to see what OCUK think about that.
Clearly someone was at fault here in terms of both lack of communication and damaging the item, and it looks like Gigabyte and OCUK are pointing the finger at each other, which doesn't really help in terms of improving things for next time.
Do we avoid Gigabyte but buy from OCUK, or do we avoid OCUK but still buy Gigabyte?