Anecdotal evidence is irrelevant when gauging the impact a political party has had on the electorate - what nonsense is this? Seriously, what level of idiot would reject their eyes and ears in favour of an article written by an agenda driven journalist?
And the comment about my place of work - what on earth is that point you're trying to make? What straw are you clutching at there? You really are miles out of your depth with this conversation.
Yes, I work offshore. The same industry I worked in back in 2014 when friends where telling me about a secret oil field that the big bad English where hiding from us, a field so abundant in resources that it could fund independence for decades. Funnily enough I didn't need to read any articles about this oil field, because it was so secret that I'd been working on it's brownfield enabling projects for the previous 4 years - a reservoir so abundant that it's struggling to achieve even half of it's planned production almost 10 years on.
It's called anecdotal evidence for a reason. It has it's place, particularly when you're assessing the impact that party policy has had on the electorate - when you are the electorate! Oh, I wonder if it's raining outside. Will I check AccuWeather? BBC weather? Sean Batty? Maybe I could open the curtains and look.
Lol what sort of 'idiot' would take anecdotal evidence over factual evidence ultimately based on undisputed govt stats?
You are the one clutching at straws as your support for Sturgeon seems to be based on 'feels' not facts.
RE your place of work I'm just suggesting that maybe someone who chooses to spend a long time away from Scotland may have the blinkers on lol..
