Unrealistic, I don't see CJ
Last edited:
They will quite literally make any lost money from double dippers back from the number of views revenue from trailer 1 alone
This was a really good video, just finished watching it and at the end Alex makes a really valid set of points based on the facts.
I'm pretty sure the trailer on Youtube isn't monetised
Any guesses yet as to the release date for the consoles?
I'm going with Tuesday 8th April (2025)
In the trailer there's a clip where you see the body cam footage from a cop as they're making a bust, I reckon this clip is from the beginning of the solo player game and it has a date on it.. 08 - 04 = 8th April
I think that might have been a clue so that's my guess!
The engine generational comparison is quite neat, I know it's 10 years or more difference, but GTA 5 still looks good today (mostly) - But what a difference 6 has:
but its based in America so wouldn't that be 4th August?
My man strolls in, simplifies everything down to playing games and bangs and crashes, basically asks the woman what she’s doing there, and calls them all nerds.
Why is everyone talking about a literal "pay per hour" system?
The GTA dev was saying how he thought the games should be priced per hour of expected game time (plus the terminal value, whatever that is)
"In terms of our pricing for any entertainment property, basically the algorithm is the value of the expected entertainment usage, which is to say the per hour value times the number of expected hours plus the terminal value that's perceived by the customer in ownership, if the title is owned rather than rented or subscribed to."
I doubt devs want to risk a literal "pay by hour" system. A lot of people probably get bored of games very quickly and likely don't put in a massive amount of hours into each game.
Totally agree with this viewpoint.i used to use this conversion when i was younger and had more time to play, getting the usual comments from colleagues “why don’t you go to the cinema or bowling like normal people” explaining that (then) a 25-30 game would get me hundreds and in a few cases thousands of hours of fun where that much money would only get me at most a few hours.
Of course they already have it running on PC thank to GTA VI videos leaks.Of course they'd have the resources. A company that size. They probably have it running on a PC already as its been in development for so long.
So the person in question they are quoting left rockstar a while ago I don’t think he worked on RDR 2. So his info may be out of date. This could very well be true in his tenure when the PS3 was king of the hill.Rockstar ‘Don’t Have the Resources’ for PC Port At Launch Says Former Developer - Try Hard Guides
A former Rockstar developer claims that part of the reason GTA VI won't get a PC port at launch is because Rockstar lacks the resources, and we've got thetryhardguides.com
Rockstar ‘Don’t Have the Resources’ for PC Port At Launch Says Former Developer
This is complete ******* in my opinion.