I suppose if you only motivation is money, then sure.The option to work 20% more hours for 40% more pay sounds great.
Last edited:
I suppose if you only motivation is money, then sure.The option to work 20% more hours for 40% more pay sounds great.
I find 2 days off a week isn't really enough time to run a house properly by yourself.
Totally agree. One reasons have a cleaner. Just to give me a bit more of that 2 day weekend backI find 2 days off a week isn't really enough time to run a house properly by yourself.
Easy solution, find a tradwife.
Well obviously! I'm not suggesting everyone do it. It depends on your personal situation of course.If you are salaried working a few extra hours gets you nothing though.
If your loaded like yourself and can take a pay cut then that's great, but many wagie slaves simply can't afford to do that.I'd take the pay cut to work 4 days if I could.
Or even 4 long days. Just waste the evening anyway most of the time
Big companies are behind the curve but lots of small/startups have leaned into it quite heavily. See lots of job postings on LinkedIn pushing it.
Yes - 28 or 30 hr weeks.
Its not about spending more time at work its about making the time you spend outside of work high quality time and not wasting it away. I prefer quality over quantity.I dunno, sounds like this guy and plenty of his colleagues might:
I wouldn't take it, but there are times in my life when it would have really helped to do for a while - if it's truly an option.I suppose if you only motivation is money, then sure.
If your loaded like yourself and can take a pay cut then that's great, but many wagie slaves simply can't afford to do that.
Its not about spending more time at work its about making the time you spend outside of work high quality time and not wasting it away. I prefer quality over quantity.
I work 6 days a week every week since I started working other than holidays and the coof. Its great as it only gives you half the number of free days to spend all of your monies on computer parts and so you end up saving more. You also get paid more too as you are going more hours. On average I do 53-56 hours which is easily sustainable all year round without burning out.
No-one on their deathbed ever said "I wish I'd spent more time at work"
If your loaded like yourself and can take a pay cut then that's great, but many wagie slaves simply can't afford to do that.
life is about living not working. Work to life balance you'd hope would get better as we go but clearly not the case. Plenty of people have no real "hobbies" outside of work so their whole life is just "working" which means they're happy to sit at work for 60 hours a week because it "keeps" them busy.
it's all a bit sad to be honest.
I’d love to do my 37.5 in 4 instead of 5 days.Definitely not loaded!.. According to the forum!
I know that's relative. But yes it's a huge benefit to get back time. That's the entire point of pay rises imo.
Most people think like that in terms of retiring earlier. But for me time now is better.
If I was given the choice. I'd probably take the 4 days and 35 hours.
Rather than 4 days and 30 hours.
But if take either vs 5 days
I'm in the same role and I flip between it being a good idea and not.I’d love to do my 37.5 in 4 instead of 5 days.
I do a lot of problem solving as part of my job (software developer) and would prefer the longer days to work on things then an extra full day to rest the old noggin.