Poll: Greenlizard0 PL & Championship Football Thread ** spoilers ** [11th - 13th July 2020]

[BaZ87]

Id argue that he hasnt gone to challenge for the ball and instead essentially kicked him off the ball. Obviously it wasnt snails pace but he has zero intention of going for the ball and therefore hes walking.

If you arent going for the ball and its clear like in this case you arent why is force relevant?

Then you're sending people off for shirt pulls and the like too. I think we had this debate after the Son red card vs Everton - those aren't the rules, whether you agree or not.

 

[adam cool dude]

I can see a red coming soon. Starting to get a bit physical.

 

[fez]

I can see a red coming soon. Starting to get a bit physical.

Nah, ref is letting them get away with a lot. No red card unless someone does something really stupid and the ref actually sees it.

 

[omnomnom]

Then you're sending people off for shirt pulls and the like too. I think we had this debate after the Son red card vs Everton - those aren't the rules, whether you agree or not.

It wasnt me that said he went to do him. Neville did. If thats his intention then why is he arguing that the force is relevant? It isnt...his intention at that moment is to hurt Greenwood in some way therefore the force is completely irrelevant.

 

[BaZ87]

It wasnt me that said he went to do him. Neville did. If thats his intention then why is he arguing that the force is relevant? It isnt...his intention at that moment is to hurt Greenwood in some way therefore the force is completely irrelevant.

Because the rules state that it's only a red card if excessive force has been used and endangered the opposition player. That's the rules and why it's relevant.

 

[fez]

We're going to be lucky to sneak a win here unless we pull our finger out.

 

[adam cool dude]

Lol how!

 

[Robbo]

That's a bad miss.

 

[omnomnom]

Because the rules state that it's only a red card if excessive force has been used and endangered the opposition player. That's the rules and why it's relevant.

Correct. Theres also "serious foul play" which id argue that is.

Edit im off to bed. Reply in the morning.

Lol

 

[adam cool dude]

That's a bad miss.

Nah just good defending looking back.

 

[BaZ87]

Correct. Theres also "serious foul play" which id argue that is.

No, that is the criteria for serious foul play.

 

[fez]

Rashford was a bit casual there and gave the defender a chance to get his foot in. Should have stabbed it home.

 

[Robbo]

Nah just good defending looking back.

Yeah, not quite as bad as it first looked. Great play from Rashford beforehand too.

 

[BaZ87]

You can see why Walker Peters didn't make it at Spurs. He looks like a championship player.

 

[robfosters]

Just saw Romeu’s challenge again. Christ, VAR really is beyond useless

 

[fez]

James on to run the ball off the pitch and waste any chances we get in the last few minutes.

 

[robfosters]

James on to run the ball off the pitch and waste any chances we get in the last few minutes.

Do you think he’ll stay in the Utd team, or could a loan spell be coming up?

 

[fez]

Do you think he’ll stay in the Utd team, or could a loan spell be coming up?

Loan spell or slowly drift away to be sold in a few years. Started well but hes been too greedy and not good enough after his good start.

 

[robfosters]

Loan spell or slowly drift away to be sold in a few years. Started well but hes been too greedy and not good enough after his good start.

Loan spells can do wonders for players, look at Kane, four different loans he had all in succession. Look at him now.

 

[adam cool dude]

Loan spell or slowly drift away to be sold in a few years. Started well but hes been too greedy and not good enough after his good start.

He is getting greedy because he hasn't scored.