Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Jan 2008
- Posts
- 7,269
- Location
- Leeds
Probably should have been 'had' ha. He has it all, pace, quick feet, good balance, much like Walcott, his brain just isn't there when he's going for 90% of the time.
THe whole league has gone to crap though, being the best of a ever weakening league isn't as good a thing as it sounds. There is a reason why in the past 2 years English teams are starting to be more routinely embarrassed, yeah, its still a cup competition and anyone can win, especially with anti football, playing "proper" football Chelsea looked much much worse this season.
A 5 year 85k a week contract for Welbeck(assuming 5 years) probably has a couple mil signing bonus and will likely take out at least 20mil from the club, despite him being basically rubbish.
Welbecks aren't what help you fund RVP's, Utd have bagloads of money and can do significantly better.
For example, making the choice to let Welbeck walk, and buying Michu on a 40k a week contract at 2mil would save you 10mil over a 5 year contract AND you have a MUCH better player.
Transfer fee's are the small part of spending, wages is where the real money goes every year, and every bad player you pay, when you can NOT pay them, is money you could spend on other players. Every decision like Welbeck adds up, 20mil over the next 5 years, its probably closer to 25mil with a signing bonus, and thats likely excluding appearance/goal/assist bonuses and a basic wage rise every year. 3 players like that and you're talking about Messi/Ronaldo level wage for someone.
Welbeck + Berbatov + Giggs + anderson was throwing away how much a year.
When Utd were their best, and when Arsenal were their best, there was no room in the first team for rubbish players, no chance of players who were really crap getting improved contracts, no massively overpaying in a desparate attempt to keep very average or poor players around. Two managers who were cut throat, who got rid of Beckham, Stam, Overmars, Petit.
hindsightmasterDM lives in a world where every club knew Michu was going to turn out great and just chose to sign player x for £10m instead. He was the same when Cabaye, Ba etc turned out to be decent signings for Newcastle too.
That's the problem, we only have 3 world class players at best, 4 if you count Hernandez (purely on his poaching ability).
The rest of the squad is 'potential' or average. And even the potential is pretty vague.
3 outfield players who are possibly world class against 7 mediocre. That isn't balance. Our centre backs are the wrong side of success and injury stricken (the backups are always injured) our midfield is reliant on Carrick, who is a solid possession player, can't do fudge all else really.
I'm a spoilt child for realising this squad is a shambles of 'homegrown potential' and players past it.
There's just not enough star talent in there. The balance is horrendous, I understand the 'doing a job' player. That was O'Shea and the likes of Butt. But there wasn't an overwhelming balance in favour of average around these players, they were backed up with 5-7 world class talents, not 3 at best.
hindsightmaster
OMS FTW
On the midfield point Carrick and Cleverley this season has probably been our best midfield partnership since Carrick and Scholes back in 2006
Fergie interview is bizarre. Why did he keep talk about us pumping he ball in the box?
Because that's how much of the second half went
Spurs won a lot of corners, a lot of free kicks and basically put a lot of high balls into the area that the likes of Vidic had to defend over and over and over again, hell the Spurs goal came from a high ball into the box.
Taking a corner/free kick is not pumping a ball in the box...
Pumping as a verb invokes hopeful balls lumped into the box. Spurs probe a hell of a lot and play around the box but I can't remember us resorting to long ball pumps. The goal was ironically from a deep cross but it was the first time I remember us doing that from open play.
For what it's worth I still dont know what this 'penalty' the Spurs supporters think they should have had because I dont remember it live
you didn't see rafael grappling caulker? it was as much a penalty as uniteds shout.
Well I've just seen the MOTD highlights and both Bale's chances came from high balls played into the box also, I dont know if Fergie was insinuating you were playing long ball or not but you certainly put in a lot of high balls into the box
For what it's worth I still dont know what this 'penalty' the Spurs supporters think they should have had because I dont remember it live and MOTD haven't deemed it worthy of showing it either so I'll take it the Spurs supporters are clutching at straws to deflect away from the fact we had a stonewaller
Yup, Cleverley compliments Carrick perfectly. Cleverley is like Scholes with Beckham's ball striking style, if he becomes half as good as either of those two I'd be very happy.
I wish Fergie would look at playing a proper 4-2-3-1 because we have the perfect squad for it with those two in the deeper midfield role.
Well it obviously wasn't given it's only the spurs supporters (well actually you) who are talking about it. Like I said I'm gonna guess it wasn't, Sky didn't flag it up during or after the game and nor have MOTD.