That was shocking! QPR might have got rid of a lot of the **** but they've still got the likes of Clint Hint and Faurlin in the team.
Faurlin is pretty decent to be fair. Hill on the other hand..
Hill was actually very good last night, but then that often happens, someone too slow not good enough for CB can often make for a more defensive than usual fullback. He also did some good passing forwards and worked hard down the left wing. Hill was shocking in the first couple games, he was actually one of the better players on the pitch for either team in that game. On the other hand, Onoura was shocking, defensively and offensively. He got in position to cross several times and just can't, he's a horrendous player, always was. LIkewise Faurlin is pretty good though not his best games last night.
First/second half was fairly similar to the Utd/Spurs game but the opposite halfs. First half was entirely West Ham, complete domination, second half was(after the subs) mostly QPR, even down to 10 men they had the better of it.
Just goes to show, experience and age, being from a bit team mean not much. Park was horrendous, as was SWP. Loads of pace, provided absolutely nothing, lightweight idiot who can't shoot and can't cross.
I'll make a point to say I didn't think Lennon would ever be good, I still don't think he's great but he was in SWP/Walcott league but in the past 3 years has moved into being a significantly effective player, SWP/Walcott are worthless.
QPR playing towards an offense were a team that weren't at all bad, nor brilliant. First half, with Park/SWP was just wrong. When you have no attacking outlet, what happened to Utd happened to QPR. It lets the other team have all the ball, push forward and get goals. When your offense is working at least you can take the game to the other side.
The one thing they still have a real issue with is players and random red cards, even Taarabt, get a red card before for two stupid yellows, one from celebrating like an idiot... then he goes and does it again.