GTX 780 Ti Specifications Leaked – Full Blown Gk110 Core with 2880 SP

EL_NEO · 3 Nov 2013 at 19:06

looks to be a nice gpu

Dicehunter · 3 Nov 2013 at 19:07

EL_NEO said:
looks to be a nice gpu

It's mainly speculation and fake stats until we can actually get some real info.

Jokester · 3 Nov 2013 at 19:08

Thursday next week is it for the unveil?

Edit: Hopefully these will be the same layout as Titan/780 for waterblocks, but I have heard that the power circuits are beefed up, so possibly not.

Gregster · 3 Nov 2013 at 19:11

So with no price gouging, this will be £525, compared to the old 780 price, this seems decent. Anyone not happy with that can get a 780 cheaper and with 3 free games.

Everyone is a winner (I am sure someone will find a way to not be happy still)

With these confirmed specs, it should make the 290X look ridicules but it is priced a fair bit over.

stulid · 3 Nov 2013 at 19:12

Jokester said:
Thursday next week is it for the unveil?

Yep.

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18553538

Silent_Scone · 3 Nov 2013 at 19:12

Gregster said:
So with no price gouging, this will be £525, compared to the old 780 price, this seems decent. Anyone not happy with that can get a 780 cheaper and with 3 free games.

Everyone is a winner (I am sure someone will find a way to not be happy still)

With these confirmed specs, it should make the 290X look ridicules but it is priced a fair bit over.

lol, they always do.

BubbySoup · 3 Nov 2013 at 20:07

Jokester said:
Thursday next week is it for the unveil?

Edit: Hopefully these will be the same layout as Titan/780 for waterblocks, but I have heard that the power circuits are beefed up, so possibly not.

I'm hoping this too. Really don't wan't to have to buy new blocks as well :/

Gregster · 3 Nov 2013 at 20:10

MjFrosty said:
lol, they always do.

ICDP · 3 Nov 2013 at 20:15

Gregster said:
So with no price gouging, this will be £525, compared to the old 780 price, this seems decent. Anyone not happy with that can get a 780 cheaper and with 3 free games.

Everyone is a winner (I am sure someone will find a way to not be happy still)

With these confirmed specs, it should make the 290X look ridicules but it is priced a fair bit over.

If we believe specs Titan already makes R9 290X look ridiculous (actual spelling), yet we know R9 290X is just as fast and by quite a bit at higher resolution such as eyefinity. 780Ti is not going to make R9 290X look anything but a bargain.

780Ti, a king in nothing but name only, but I suppose it's good enough for Nvidia fans. You know what they say about a fool and his money.

Boomstick777 · 3 Nov 2013 at 20:16

Gregster · 3 Nov 2013 at 20:18

I tried to compete with Boom but no chance

Too funny mate

stulid · 3 Nov 2013 at 20:20

ICDP said:
A king in nothing but name only, but I suppose it's good enough for Nvidia fans. You know what they say about a fool and his money.

I'm no fool

ICDP · 3 Nov 2013 at 21:26

All joking aside, 780Ti looks like a great card and will probably end up around 10% faster than R9 290X. I just hope the rumours of it being $150 (£112 with VAT) more expensive are exaggerated because a 26% price premium for such little gains is back to rip off Nvidia.

Lets lose the green vs red mentality and don't compare to R9 290X, compare to GTX780. Many people on this forum will have noticed that the AIB custom cooled OC 780s, which can be bought for ~£380 are almost as fast as a reference R9 290X. If we compare the rumoured price of 780Ti to a custom cooled GTX780 it is an almost 50% price hike for ~15% performance. Now that is why I made my "fool and his money" post.

DarrenM343 · 3 Nov 2013 at 21:41

ICDP said:
All joking aside, 780Ti looks like a great card and will probably end up around 10% faster than R9 290X. I just hope the rumours of it being $150 (£112 with VAT) more expensive are exaggerated because a 26% price premium for such little gains is back to rip off Nvidia.

Isn't that normal? On the fastest product, don't expect to pay 10% more for 10% more performance over the next fastest product, there's always a premium to pay without even considering other qualities such as looks vs the competitors, supporting software etcetc.

Compare the fastest road car to the next fastest.It's price will be multiples of the % extra performance it offers over it's rival.

EL_NEO · 3 Nov 2013 at 21:42

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti official gaming performance

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti official gaming performance

http://videocardz.com/47587/nvidia-geforce-gtx-780-ti-official-gaming-performance

ICDP · 3 Nov 2013 at 21:49

DarrenM343 said:
Isn't that normal? On the fastest product, don't expect to pay 10% more for 10% more performance over the next fastest product, there's always a premium to pay without even considering other qualities such as looks vs the competitors, supporting software etcetc.

Compare the fastest road car to the next fastest.It's price will be multiples of the % extra performance it offers over it's rival.

I don't expect price increase to performance ratio to be linear, but it should at least not take the ****. Price perf between GTX780 and R9 290X is now roughly correct, same with 770 and 280X. We should not accept that a ~10%-15% performance increase suddenly warrants a 30%-50% premium.

Boomstick777 · 3 Nov 2013 at 22:18

GeForce GTX 780 Ti is about 20% faster than 290X in Quiet Mode. In Uber Mode R9 290X is still slower than 780 Ti, but only by 13%.

http://videocardz.com/47587/nvidia-geforce-gtx-780-ti-official-gaming-performance

So 20% faster than Quiet mode, 13% faster than 'Uber' :rolleyes:

mode.

That's before overclocking..

Then throw in, Physx, Shadowplay, lower power consumption, less heat / noise and for those that are interested, G-Sync. Nvidia def a strong counter to AMD's 290X + Mantle.

My will power will be tested on launch day, don't think I can resist lol. Nice new card to mess with until Maxwell...

Jokester · 3 Nov 2013 at 22:20

Power consumption appeared to be higher from the other leaked benchies.

Boomstick777 · 3 Nov 2013 at 22:23

Jokester said:
Power consumption appeared to be higher from the other leaked benchies.

780ti is 250watt / 290X for comparison is 290watt..

Gregster · 3 Nov 2013 at 22:23

Gregster said:
So with no price gouging, this will be £525, compared to the old 780 price, this seems decent. Anyone not happy with that can get a 780 cheaper and with 3 free games.

Everyone is a winner (I am sure someone will find a way to not be happy still)

With these confirmed specs, it should make the 290X look ridicules but it is priced a fair bit over.

ICDP said:
All joking aside, 780Ti looks like a great card and will probably end up around 10% faster than R9 290X. I just hope the rumours of it being $150 (£112 with VAT) more expensive are exaggerated because a 26% price premium for such little gains is back to rip off Nvidia.

Lets lose the green vs red mentality and don't compare to R9 290X, compare to GTX780. Many people on this forum will have noticed that the AIB custom cooled OC 780s, which can be bought for ~£380 are almost as fast as a reference R9 290X. If we compare the rumoured price of 780Ti to a custom cooled GTX780 it is an almost 50% price hike for ~15% performance. Now that is why I made my "fool and his money" post.

ICDP said:
I don't expect price increase to performance ratio to be linear, but it should at least not take the ****. Price perf between GTX780 and R9 290X is now roughly correct, same with 770 and 280X. We should not accept that a ~10%-15% performance increase suddenly warrants a 30%-50% premium.

Guess I was right but thought it would not still be on the same page

In fairness, £525 ($699) is expensive but for a couple of % speed less, you have the option to get the note worthy 780, which was sold and bought at the $699 price prior to the 290X launch. I bet they still sell by the truck load regardless of the whingers.

Ohhh and some of the custom OC 780's are considerably faster than the 290X and cheaper.