Indeed, we have few firearms injuries or deaths and relatively few prosecutions for offences too. I know I can go out pretty much anywhere in GB and have no fear of being shot which is a bonus.
Interesting that the Israeli authorities today told all citizens with licensed firearms to carry them in the wake of several 'small-scale' terror attacks by Palestinians. In the wake of more terror attacks in Europe I think we're going to have to relax our gun control laws for trustworthy individuals (e.g. me).
Where is the gun ranges, i have looked in to it and found it near impossible to get in to one and shoot a gun.
Its far easier to fly to poland and walk in to one there and within 10 mins shooting any gun you want.
When the situation in the UK becomes as risky as Israel then I'll rethink my views on it, until then I think we're fine.
Is it really a bonus if the risk of you being injured or killed overall is unchanged?
Is perception more important than actual risk?
As a gun owner myself I can say that the current laws here in northern Ireland are pretty adequate as is.
Is firearm crime increasing in the United Kingdom?
No, there was a sharp increase following the ban on handguns in 1997 which was to be expected as the ban only effected legal holders and made criminals out of them if they werent handed in to police for destruction (with no compensation)
Oh dear, to claim you know statistics to make a statement so fundamentally flawed is quite funny.If the gun bans had a beneficial effect. The overall murder rate will decrease.
As a gun owner myself I can say that the current laws here in northern Ireland are pretty adequate as is. Our system differs from the rest of the uk in that all weapons have to be held on an FAC. Air rifles too, which I believe on the mainland can be purchased by anyone over 18 without any background checks or licensing? To own any weapon you must state the purpose for which you intend to use it, ie sporting purposes such as clay/target shooting, game/rough shooting.
Handguns' are still available here but most are held as personal protection weapons by ex or serving police officers, military personnel or prison staff. All applicants should ideally have a clean criminal record, but I know of cases where people have been turned down on a first application due to previous convictions but have been granted a certificate at a later date. For target shooting with rifles you may require club membership iirc. But for game/rough shooting you need the landowners permission. This along with letters from at least two people to act as character witnesses go towards the application for the FAC.
Are those persons allowed to concealed carry or is it home defence only ?
Is it really a bonus if the risk of you being injured or killed overall is unchanged?
Is perception more important than actual risk?
Wicked posts so far, thank you fellas.
I have heard shot gun owners are often business owners who want to own a gun in their home in case someone breaks in and tries to nick their Evoque/jewellery or nouveau rich-lad-conveyance.
Where do you stand - can you shoot the oik?
Are those persons allowed to concealed carry or is it home defence only ?
Whoever told you this is a tool, an utter one at that and entirely not true unless your in a 1960's gangster movie.
Also if you shoot at a burglar expect to be facing murder or similar charges