Soldato
This talk of narrow squats has me thinking of Jon North.
I think I know who you're referring to, and I don't think they got their big squatting and deadlift numbers with deadlift stance squats (even if they think they helped).deadlift width squat stance. good / bad?
seeing a few people with meaty deads and squats doing these (specifically mentioning that feet width is same) and getting benefits.
Normally my feet are outside shoulder width for squats and about shoulder width for deads.
I think I know who you're referring to, and I don't think they got their big squatting and deadlift numbers with deadlift stance squats (even if they think they helped).
I'm not going to rule them out without trialling them on myself or other people, but I doubt they offer much useful training effect.
I try to get my feet as straight as possible for squats, it's the only way I can properly screw my feet in to the floor and feel any real torque being created.
Quick link to explain lots about squats, but includes what I'm explaining http://www.marksdailyapple.com/the-missing-link-movement-as-a-skill/#axzz2YSY7esNV
Really, it's kind of because they have the benefit of good coaching. As a cookie cutter rule, feet as parallel as possible is much (MUCH) better than specifying more turn out.I'm going to go out on a non-regular limb and suggest that toes out a tiny bit more than "five to one o'clock" is not going to kill you or your knees, provided you can keep them in the correct alignment (knees outside your big toe).
Most people can't do this easily (or properly), which is one of the reasons it's not advised.
A lot of Olympic lifters, for instance, will squat with quite a narrow stance with toes relatively far out (and knees, too) compared to powerlifters, etc.
Why? No idea. Practically, as somebody who pretends to snatch and clean, it allows the lifter to get a lot deeper into the squat and keep a good core alignment (and upright-ness) than otherwise. Doing this with a wide, parallel stance is perfectly possible, but none of the top Olympic lifters do it (tell a lie - there are a couple of Chinese dudes who go ultra wide and almost parallel in the catch, but pffft.).
However, you also have to bear in mind that these lifters know what they're doing...
Squaaaaaatz:
I've adopted a slightly narrower stance with more knees out but am finding that I struggle with hip hinge/drive. I can feel it's not my strongest set up but is much more comfortable when in the hole and eradicates any tucking.
The last few times it feels like the tendons/muscles running through my rec fem are getting pinched by the head of my femur against my pelvis. My hip has been quite tight so have used compresses and MWOD hip stretching (rear foot raise, glute tenses, hip pushed forward with a slight lean).
I'm pretty certain my stance is too narrow and that it's occurred naturally to allow more knees out. I feel a lot more glute recruitment but without strong hip drive won't be getting out the hole at heavier weights. It could just be a case of adjusting to the new style or a minor error in the mechanics.
Pls respond.
Do you have some sort of mobility issue? Or is there another reason why you don't go past parallel?