Clearly he has not been if you had watched the racing this season.
So you can only be looking at the points.
you have been proven over and over again to be blind where MS is concerend so there is no point going further
Clearly he has not been if you had watched the racing this season.
So you can only be looking at the points.
2) Even with the Merc money behind him, Brawn hasnt managed that well in the last three years - and its likely to be four before that changes. Its a 50/50 bet whether Brawn and Merc comes out a winner (on reg changes etc) in 2014
i agree mr men is wasting his timeyou have been proven over and over again to be blind where MS is concerend so there is no point going further
daimler havent been willing to throw money at the team and the shareholders arent to kee on f1 atleast the vocal shareholders.
putting the amg monika on the team seemed to be a way for mercedes to distance there core brand from the f1 team.
the budgets for 2011 were
1] Ferrari: €440m (Same budget since 2008, 2012 will see it go down to €300m)
2] McLaren: €320m (Down €5m on 2010, 2012 will see it go down to €285m)
3] Red Bull: €285m (up €40m on 2010, will stay same for 2012)
4] Mercedes: €225m (up €40m on 2010, will stay same for 2012)
5] Renault: €185m (down €40m on 2010, uncertain for 2012)
6] Williams: €140m (down €40m on 2010, will stay same for 2012)
7] Force India: €135m (up €10m on 2010, will drop to €130m for 2012)
8] Sauber: €125m (up from €75m in 2010, will stay same in 2012)
=] Toro Rosso: €125m (up €15m from 2010, will increase to €140m in 2012)
10] Team Lotus: €120m (€20m up on 2010, however 2012 will see this riase to a minimum of €150m)
11] Virgin: €66m (up from €45m in 2010, this is expected to rise to €85m for 2012)
12] Hispania: €55m (up from a €38.6m budget, expected to rise to a budget of arround €65m to €70m in 2012)
Im not saying its correct but look at it another way
1) Merc wins vs McLaren (even just this year, or to benefit Merc a little incl Brawn wins and McLaren would still be out front)
2) Even with the Merc money behind him, Brawn hasnt managed that well in the last three years - and its likely to be four before that changes. Its a 50/50 bet whether Brawn and Merc comes out a winner (on reg changes etc) in 2014
3) Simon fuller was looking at the personal sponsorship package LH could earn at Merc (that would be relatively non-existant at McLaren) which is why LH's "advisors" where pushing this deal instead of McLaren
4) Its just as easy to argue that McLaren have such a history of winning that the WDC / WCC is only a matter of time before they win it again. Merc still have to prove they can win it as a team (given that majority of Brawn arent there any more). No more or no less likely than Mercedes winning in 2014
compared to Brawn, Merc are mega rich (as a team)
ms was taking around 10 million but bringing 30 million to the team as dieter said a few years ago they had a 20mil profit from sponsors even after paying his wage.Would be interesting to know how much MS is taking in salary compared to LH's supposed joining salary (wondering if that will leave more money for design /development for 2013)
you have been proven over and over again to be blind where MS is concerend so there is no point going further
1/If a driver wants a world title, wins don't matter, consistency does, Mclaren should be WAY out infront, with a 1-2 in the championship and massive lead in the constructors, Alonso is showing consistency matters more than wins.
Merc havent shown consistancy either - unless you mean going progressively backwards each season
2/afaik they've been spending way less in the past 3 years and have only got staff levels back to where they were years ago, in the past year or so. If that is the case they haven't had the Brawn money for 3 years, they've lacked it, and if they've got their staff levels back up in the past year, not sure why it would take 4 years to show up? Considering the supposed lack of money and lack of staff, and two drivers of whom neither are the best on the grid, the fact they are as close as they are is actually encouraging surely?
BS they have been building up for at least two years (yes I know 2010 was on a restricted workforce, but winter of 2010, and winter of 2011 they did a lot of hiring)
4/ the difference is he's been at Mclaren and their ability to win races when the car is the best on the weekend is spotty at best. Right or wrong, if he's lost trust in his team at Mclaren and Brawn has persuaded him that if they can get the right car their ability to win a title is better than Mclarens, that is all that is key here.
Mclaren HAVE the best car this year and currently almost no chance at the title.... Mclaren having the best car isn't the key, its Hamilton's belief that they can put that car into a title winning position and Mclaren have fallen over themselves for 4 years suggesting they can't.
no they had a mass recruiting spree in 2010-2011Wasn't it only this year Mercedes got their staffing levels back up to where they were before Brawn cut jobs in 2009.
Perez is 14/1 to win the title next year
Might be worth a punt...
Can't wait to see Perez finish higher than Lewis in the WDC next year
For the first time he is the lead driver in a well established team
If it happens I'll tattoo 'arknor' on my left buttock.
ino one can tell the future, mclaren could have another season like 09, who knows.
.
I'd say he was the lead driver at Honda, and they were well established.
They were pants, but well establised