Harry and Meghan to resign

Sounds as if Harry's impetuousness in bringing these charges has the same recipe for disaster as the I'll advised and brought "Tranby Croft" case had for his great great great grandfather, before he became King Edward VII

Pity George Carman is no longer alive, Harry up against the rapier like Carman would have seen the case over in under two days <lol>

This evisceration will take longer and be far less eloquent with someone like the ponderous Andrew Green KC cross examining the dullard Prince.
 
Last edited:
Sky's doing a reconstruction this evening - sample doesn't show if Mr Green will also be acted -
syndicated this could make more money than other H&M films - maybe sky will give money to charity.

news.sky.com

Prince Harry court case - latest: Harry arrives - as barrister adopts three tactics to discredit his case

Prince Harry is back in the witness box at the High Court today, facing Mirror Group Newspapers barrister Andrew Green KC. Follow live updates from inside the courtroom here - and watch reaction and analysis live on Sky News in the stream below.
news.sky.com news.sky.com
 
Going from bad to worse today - his legal team must be rubbish.

He's another celebrity that thinks the rules according to Twitter apply to the real world.. unfortunately 'victims' aren't automatically believed and its not wrong to question them in the real world..
 
.. or Harry is .
Maybe Mr Greene (keep thinking of the Bond villain) was told to spin things out so that he'll be on his knees with the debt of the court fees and Mirror group defammation penalty.

Moving on to another article about details of Harry’s break-up with Chelsy Davy, Green asks if Harry was aware the story was broken by the News of the World the day before on its website.
The News of the World article was topped “A world exclusive” and appeared online, a lengthy article with a lot of detail.
“Also a suspicious article,” Harry says.
Green says the article describes how Chelsy Davy changed her Facebook status to ‘not in a relationship’.
“If that’s what she did,” Harry says. “I don’t believe that it was.”
.....
Green says there is not a single item of call data at any time between Harry’s phone and any Mirror Group journalist.
“Do you think the absence of call data suggests you were not hacked by any MGN journalist?” Green asks.
“Absolutely not,” Harry replies.
“If the court finds that you were not hacked by MGN would you be relieved or disappointed?” Green asks.
Harry says phone hacking has been done on an “industrial scale” across at least three of the papers – and says any decision with his claim, he would “feel some injustice if it wasn’t accepted”.
“You want to have been phone hacked?” Green asks.
“Nobody wants to be phone hacked,” Harry replies.
Click to expand...

Love to know how much personal data people actually consecrated to voice messages, at that time to be hacked ... if they're not there you say call me back. re:xx
 
n111ck said:
Going from bad to worse today - his legal team must be rubbish.

He's another celebrity that thinks the rules according to Twitter apply to the real world.. unfortunately 'victims' aren't automatically believed and its not wrong to question them in the real world..
Click to expand...
He's used to be given platforms to say whatever he wants without being directly questioned or scrutinised.

This is no friendly Oprah interview with sympathetic lighting and overdub music but other then the Paul Burrell moment yesterday I don't think he's slipped up much today (tbf I haven't been keeping that close an eye on it so if there has been some bombshell moments I'm happy to be corrected).
 
jpaul said:
.. or Harry is .
Maybe Mr Greene (keep thinking of the Bond villain) was told to spin things out so that he'll be on his knees with the debt of the court fees and Mirror group defammation penalty.



Love to know how much personal data people actually consecrated to voice messages, at that time to be hacked ... if they're not there you say call me back. re:xx
Click to expand...
I've known people who have been dumped by text but a breakup by voicemail, that's a new one.
 
Freddie1980 said:
He's used to be given platforms to say whatever he wants without being directly questioned or scrutinised.

This is no friendly Oprah interview with sympathetic lighting and overdub music but other then the Paul Burrell moment yesterday I don't think he's slipped up much today (tbf I haven't been keeping that close an eye on it so if there has been some bombshell moments I'm happy to be corrected).
Click to expand...

Well..

Mr Green was almost done. “You’ve never been able to identify any story in a Mirror Group paper that was clearly written from a message left on your phone,” he said.

The Duke said it was a question for his legal team before adding: “There is hard evidence to suggest an incredible amount of suspiciousness.”

Whether “suspiciousness” is enough remains to be seen. :D
 
you can't disagree with Harry's personal truth (his psych told him that), and millions of GenA would concur

jpaul said:
'Whatever the cause, my memory is my memory, it does what it does, gathers and curates as it sees fit, and there's just as much truth in what I remember and how I remember it as there is in so-called objective facts.'
Click to expand...
Mr Greene should have probed him on that, maybe he could have suggested H wasn't of sound mind.
 
As others have said, this isn't a namby pamby feelings are more important than facts occasion that he has become so used to.

Can't help but feel that all the people nodding and patting him on the back for telling his truth the past few years might have made him a little disconnected from the reality of the real world.

The media are scumbags but if you want to take them to task in court you had better come prepared.
 
It's a civil case so the burden of proof is a lot lower. I mean, knowing the level of phone hacking that went on at the time, it stretches credibility that his phone wasn't hacked.
 
Reading the reports today, I feel as though I must be missing something here.

He said he's not aware of any evidence he had been hacked by the Mirror but he's gone to court to accuse them of hacking his voicemail. Even though some of the alleged instances of hacking were from when he didn't actually have a phone.

Is that an accurate summary?
 
Feek said:
Reading the reports today, I feel as though I must be missing something here.

He said he's not aware of any evidence he had been hacked by the Mirror but he's gone to court to accuse them of hacking his voicemail. Even though some of the alleged instances of hacking were from when he didn't actually have a phone.

Is that an accurate summary?
Click to expand...

Yes, pad it out a bit an you can be on a grand or two an hour like Andrew Green KC ;) Candy off babies comes to mind.
 
Sankari said:
It's just very suspicious, that's all I'm saying.

742kbQO.png



* Barry Mannakee: 1980s
* James Gilbey: late 1980s
* James Hewitt: 1986-1991
* Oliver Hoare: 1992

Hoare was apparently the last straw for Charles, since their divorce commenced in December 1992.
Click to expand...

So the hoare was ******* a hoare? Oh I'd have loved to be an editor when that story broke! :D
 
Freakbro said:
It's a civil case so the burden of proof is a lot lower. I mean, knowing the level of phone hacking that went on at the time, it stretches credibility that his phone wasn't hacked.
Click to expand...

I suspect Harry is probably right in what he is saying but has no real proof that it happened.

But rather than bury it and move on, he wants to take the media to task.

Unfortunately, there is every likelihood he'll lose and end up looking a bit silly.
 
previous days cross-examination of H, many/all of the leaks he raised were in other publications first, or could not have been Mirror phone hacking (he had no phone),
defence should have done it's homework to just discuss less defensible leaks, or, at least, acknowledge the problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom