Harry and Meghan to resign

[Deleted member 68110]

So there's a whole thread's worth of evidence but you can't actually point to any... strong argument there.

Calling out conspiracy nonsense = defending abuse in your mind?

I'm not interested in going down another aspie dowiehole, thanks.

If you want to try and argue that, despite being one of the main contributors to the thread, actually you hold no strong opinion (and therefore what? You're just trolling instead?), crack on.

 

[dowie]

I'm not interested in going down another aspie dowiehole, thanks.

If you want to try and argue that, despite being one of the main contributors to the thread, actually you hold no strong opinion (and therefore what? You're just trolling instead?), crack on.

You're like some schizophrenic here, previously you posted some conspiracy nonsense and gave non-replies when questioned on it, then you claim I'm defending abuse (and it's all over the thread... but strangely you can't cite anything) and now you've pivoted your claim to simply one that I have a "strong opinion"? Bit vague...

Why not just read what I've posted instead of your usual fantasist behaviour where you just make things up to get mad at?

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

Christ what a lot of waffle to say nothing of value. I'll leave you camp out in this thread as you obviously have nowhere else to go and leave you to stew in whatever mire you find yourself inn

nice retort, that showed me.

 

[Deleted member 68110]

You're like some schizophrenic here, previously you posted some conspiracy nonsense and gave non-replies when questioned on it, then you claim I'm defending abuse (and it's all over the thread... but strangely you can't cite anything) and now you've pivoted your claim to simply one that I have a "strong opinion"? Bit vague...

Why not just read what I've posted instead of your usual fantasist behaviour where you just make things up to get mad at?

I'm not mad, but then you always seem to struggle at gauging the emotions of others which I think is a facet of the problem with so much of your posting on any given subject.

It goes hand in hand with this insistence on absolute literalism and these aspie dowieholes where you demand someone show you the one sentence that demonstates the point being made in one clear black-and-white example, rather than accept or recognise inferences any other normal person can see straight away.

Anyway, you carry on insisting you're not heavily invested in a thread in which you're the second most prolific poster.

 

[Irish_Tom]

The cream of horses, cattle, dogs, cats, even the humble budgie and pigeon are based on bloodlines and breeding. The progeny of the supreme members of their type did no work to achieve their own greatness, it is purely down to eugenics As an ardent believer in eugenics I am embracing of breeding to good bloodlines.

Your argument falls down the second you look at the current Royal Family. They’re hardly paragons of human genetics, are they? Plus, you know, all the inbreeding.

 

[Chris Wilson]

Your argument falls down the second you look at the current Royal Family. They’re hardly paragons of human genetics, are they? Plus, you know, all the inbreeding.

I never said the British Royal Family were a good example of eugenics used to create superior beings, deliberately, becuase they are not, I was talking of bloodlines and eugenics in in general. I have no belief the British Royal Family are trying to create a master race <LOL> Given most people pore over the pedigree of a puppy they are thinking of buying, yet marry their spouse without any digging into their family tree at all, eugenics in the human species is still quite niche.

 

[dowie]

I'm not mad

Doubtful...

Anyway, you carry on insisting you're not heavily invested in a thread in which you're the second most prolific poster.

Where have I insisted that? This is just more schizo posting from you where you just argue against things you've imagined... Previously you claimed I was defending abuse, yet you can't seem to point out where... seems like more deflection from you being called out on your conspiracy theory nonsense.

Can you at least attempt some coherent argument based on things that have actually been stated rather than the stuff made up in your head? You can't seem to do that so instead you declare that your false claims are somehow obvious, yet the claims you're making are about me and I can point out both that I'm not defending abuse and that you've got no basis for that claim, if you did you'd be able to show it.

 

[Dirk Diggler]

I never said the British Royal Family were a good example of eugenics used to create superior beings, deliberately, becuase they are not, I was talking of bloodlines and eugenics in in general. I have no belief the British Royal Family are trying to create a master race <LOL> Given most people pore over the pedigree of a puppy they are thinking of buying, yet marry their spouse without any digging into their family tree at all, eugenics in the human species is still quite niche.

You do realise that you just compared the process of courting your wife to buying a dog.

 

[Chris Wilson]

You do realise that you just compared the process of courting your wife to buying a dog.

Courting has no part in it, assessing a potential breeding partner should have similarities to choosing a dog from its pedigree information, yes indeed! Should choosing a wife be something less considered than choosing a dog?

 

[Dirk Diggler]

Courting has no part in it, assessing a potential breeding partner should have similarities to choosing a dog from its pedigree information, yes indeed! Should choosing a wife be something less considered than choosing a dog?

My heart goes out to both of them, TBH.

 

[turbot1984]

Should choosing a wife be something less considered than choosing a dog?

That's a wind up right?

 

[Chris Wilson]

That's a wind up right?

Well, no it's not, how would you prioritise things, would you say it's sensible to consider all aspects of a future wife to a lesser degree than all aspects of a future canine?

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

Courting has no part in it, assessing a potential breeding partner should have similarities to choosing a dog from its pedigree information, yes indeed! Should choosing a wife be something less considered than choosing a dog?

Black Mirror here we come.

You only have to see the complete disasters in animal breeding to know that eugenics is something we should want no part of. Our aristocracy is a perfect example of inbreeding and the problems it brings. Again no one should be above anyone else just because of the cot they were born in.

 

[Destination]

Well errm lads.
Queen dead.
Sort yourselves out on another thread.
Tell us your Queen tales on this one.

 

[Irish_Tom]

Black Mirror here we come.

You only have to see the complete disasters in animal breeding to know that eugenics is something we should want no part of. Our aristocracy is a perfect example of inbreeding and the problems it brings. Again no one should be above anyone else just because of the cot they were born in.

This is someone who advocated for state-mandated mass sterilisation, that would only be reversed once a couple had passed certain tests.

Chris’ ideal society would have been discarded by the Black Mirror writers for being too far fetched.

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

This is someone who advocated for state-mandated mass sterilisation, that would only be reversed once a couple had passed certain tests.

Chris’ ideal society would have been discarded by the Black Mirror writers for being too far fetched.

I forget about that

He would have loved Germany in the 1930s early 40s. Eugenics and laws to protect blood purity.

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

Well errm lads.
Queen dead.
Sort yourselves out on another thread.
Tell us your Queen tales on this one.

There is a thread for that already. This is the thread for talking about Harry, Meghan and whether there was a campaign by societies high ups along with the tabloid press to drive her out. Or for others to **** her off and blame her for all the wrongs of the world.

 

[Bassmansam]

if you don’t like the royals just ignore them? Would it really make you happier if they were to cease being?

 

[EdwardTeach]

The cream of horses, cattle, dogs, cats, even the humble budgie and pigeon are based on bloodlines and breeding. The progeny of the supreme members of their type did no work to achieve their own greatness, it is purely down to eugenics As an ardent believer in eugenics I am embracing of breeding to good bloodlines.

Do you honestly think the royal family are an example of good breeding? Harry and Charles both only managed 2 a levels despite going to elite private schools, and let's not talk about Prince Andrew (unless breeding people to lose the ability to sweat is a priority).

 

[StriderX]

Inbreeding eventually results in deformity and sterility, a dead end brought about by the sad reality of how flawed monarchies were and thus discarded when there was a better option.