Harry and Meghan to resign

Angilion said:
It started because he has an assault rifle tattooed on his leg. Which makes him stand out. It's something the media can clickbait about and get people in a lather. So they did. Because that's what they do. They're completely amoral and don't care at all about the truth (in this case, the reason why Sterling has that tattoo) or the harm they do. To anyone. It's not a race thing. The gutter press is the gutter press to everyone. They'll print anything about anyone if they can get away with it and it will get them attention and power/profit.
Click to expand...
It didnt it started whilst he was still at Liverpool long before the tattoo.
 
chroniclard said:
There is plenty of evidence of the issues online. Not sure why people are denying things so hard.
Click to expand...

There's plenty of stories about aliens building the pyramids online too. I looked for Sterling online. All I found were some claims about how the gutter press coverage of him must be racism because he's "black". Without any evidence of that gutter press coverage of him, let alone evidence that it was solely due to racism.
 
Angilion said:
How many negative front pages has Sterling had? I bet you don't know.

As other people have already pointed out, there are plenty of examples of negative coverage of "white" people in the UK press, including but by no means limited to football players. Most of the UK press is a festering cesspit.

You're blinded by your racism. If you walked into a hospital ward containing 10 "white" men with a broken leg and 10 "black" men with a broken leg you'd see 10 "black" men with a broken leg. You're a devout believer in race and in unchosen group identity, the doctrine of "they're all the same". You reject the idea of an individual, a person. Assuming you can understand that concept at all. So you assume that anything about anyone is solely due to the unchosen group identity you assign them to.

Can you name a "white" player who had an assault rifle tattooed on his leg? I doubt it.

That tattoo is obviously a dog whistle calling for violent revolution and racist genocide. I know because the Emperor's new clothes told me and I am special. It doesn't matter what Sterling said about it because I am special and I know what he means better than he does.

Anyone can do your dog whistle thing. It's not at all difficult.
Click to expand...

My god you do talk some utter drivel. If there was a company for talking drivel you'd make CEO. There are posters that just love all the identity nonsense but you take it to new levels, you're like a rabid dog with it.

Angilion said:
That's the only headline I could find about him. Actually, I couldn't even find that headline, only references to it. Seems like there are nowhere near as many front pages about him as some people are claiming there are.
Click to expand...

You can't even use google it seems.
 
Last edited:
Angilion said:
There's plenty of stories about aliens building the pyramids online too. I looked for Sterling online. All I found were some claims about how the gutter press coverage of him must be racism because he's "black". Without any evidence of that gutter press coverage of him, let alone evidence that it was solely due to racism.
Click to expand...

But you're missing the point - He's Black - and therefore based solely on that single immutable characteristic, a handful of very vocal white liberal people have decided that no-one, and I mean absolutely no-one can ever, EVER say anything even slightly negative about him, irrespective whether it's deserved or not, because if you do then you're obviously a racist, irrespective of your skin colour of course, and they do this because these white liberal folks think that a rich, famous black man is unable to defend themselves in this deeply racist nation, so only these white people can defend the poor black man. There's a reason Malcom X detested white liberals and called them more racist than the Klan and I think I can understand his point.
 
Last edited:
ianh said:
But you're missing the point - He's Black - and therefore based solely on that single immutable characteristic, a handful of very vocal white liberal people have decided that no-one, and I mean absolutely no-one can ever, EVER say anything even slightly negative about him, irrespecti it's deserved or not, because if you do then you're obviously a racist, irrespective of your skin colour of course, and they do this because these white liberal folks think that a rich, famous black man is unable to defend themselves in this deeply racist nation, so only these white people can defend the poor black man. There's a reason Malcom X detested white liberals and called them more racist than the Klan and I think I can understand his point.
Click to expand...

Yeah that exactly what they're saying :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Who said the nation the was racist? You seem to be putting words in people's mouths.

And using Malcom X, don't make me laugh, he wouldn't spit on some of you lot.
 
So just to be clear @Colonel_Klinck - is it ONLY because she's "black" that GB news are reporting negatively about her, and absolutely nothing else about her (i.e. her attitude, what she's said, her actions so far etc), it's solely her skin colour that's caused this negative reporting?

Now, "racist nation" - Thats definitely my words, unless you think there's no racism in the UK in which case we aren't a racist nation - so which is it Klinck, are we a racist nation or not?

Also, Malcom X hated people like you more far more than he would've hated someone like me, and thats in his own words not mine and, as a black man, you can't disagree with him or you're a racist :)
 
Last edited:
Colonel_Klinck said:
My god you do talk some utter drivel. If there was a company for talking drivel you'd make CEO. There are posters that just love all the identity nonsense but you take it to new levels, you're like a rabid dog with it.
Click to expand...

I can't reach your levels, though. A bigger difference is that you believe in "all the identity nonsense" and I don't.

Colonel_Klinck said:
You can't even use google it seems.
Click to expand...

I choose not to use google because it deliberately biases results in order to promote echo chambers and conflict.
 
chroniclard said:
Ok, well you keep picking on sterling for some reason but it's not just him. He is just one of the more high profile ones who have called out the press.

Also plenty of evidence of the presses racism towards markle.
Click to expand...

Waiting for all these head lines still mate, I'll check back tomorrow lmao
 
Angilion said:
There's plenty of stories about aliens building the pyramids online too. I looked for Sterling online. All I found were some claims about how the gutter press coverage of him must be racism because he's "black". Without any evidence of that gutter press coverage of him, let alone evidence that it was solely due to racism.
Click to expand...
It’s this sort of reporting, which impacts players beyond Sterling (below is Tosin Adarabioyo, Marcus Rashford has had similar):

1*ikqenw9dSk3cGlsyBt8wVw.png
 
Last edited:
Roar87 said:
Are there any other crucial differences between those 2 players?
Click to expand...
Isn't that "find my evidence for me" type stuff?

You tell us.

What *is* this other crucial difference that has meant the "I'm not racist but there's not a single issue about race on which I've not positioned myself on the side of the racists" OCUKer have maintained their unbroken record here?
 
Roar87 said:
Are there any other crucial differences between those 2 players?
Click to expand...

Could it be one was playing for the first team and the other wasn't?
Surely buying a £2.25 million mansion is a bit dicey when you haven't played first team football.
I know on that new Football Academy series the 18 year olds given a pro contract are on £40,000 a year.
 
SexyGreyFox said:
Could it be one was playing for the first team and the other wasn't?
Surely buying a £2.25 million mansion is a bit dicey when you haven't played first team football.
I know on that new Football Academy series the 18 year olds given a pro contract are on £40,000 a year.
Click to expand...

Bingo. That's the obvious difference. Phil Foden was playing first team football and had scored 3 goals in 2018, Adarabioyo hadn't played a single game in 3 seasons. Of course people find it slightly odd someone can afford a £2m mansion without ever having kicked a ball in the Premier League. But nah, must be skin colour.
 
Roar87 said:
Bingo. That's the obvious difference. Phil Foden was playing first team football and had scored 3 goals in 2018, Adarabioyo hadn't played a single game in 3 seasons. Of course people find it slightly odd someone can afford a £2m mansion without ever having kicked a ball in the Premier League. But nah, must be skin colour.
Click to expand...
I know you're trying your best not to see the obvious difference, but come on man it's the Daily Mail... hardly a bastion of neutrality and love now is it? They literally make their money preying on ignorance and hatred. Here's some choice ones for Meghan:

Kate: "Kate's morning sickness cure? Prince William gifted with an avocado for pregnant Duchess"
Meghan: "Meghan Markle's beloved avocado linked to human right abuse and drought, millennial shame"

Kate: "Why you can always say it with flowers"
Meghan: "How Meghan Markle's flowers may have put Princess Charlotte's life at risk"

Kate: "Kate and Wills Inc: Duke and Duchess secretly set up companies to protect their brand - just like the Beckhams"
Meghan: "A right royal cash in! How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle trademarked over 100 items from hoodies and to socks SIX MONTHS before split with monarchy - with new empire worth up to £400m"

You don't really get more transparent than the rags campaign against those two, and if you can't see that, you've had your eyes willingly gouged out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom