Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,169
- Location
- London, UK
Vengeful, spiteful, utterly vile people. Seem to marry up to me!
You're talking about Clarkson right?
Last edited:
Vengeful, spiteful, utterly vile people. Seem to marry up to me!
Clarkson could literally have just kept his rant to Meghan, so why include the others if not to bundle them together?
You're talking about Clarkson right?
I think it's rather just a demonstration of how utterly subservient Harry is to her.
I fear you’ve rather given yourself away there.I think it's rather just a demonstration of how utterly subservient Harry is to her.
Something something my dad, uncle, brother, mate Dave. You sexist!
Vengeful, spiteful, utterly vile
What does than mean in regards to what I wrote?
I fear you’ve rather given yourself away there.
Suggest you read the last few posts then all will be revealed!
What does than mean in regards to what I wrote?
That is pure conjecture. None of us have any idea of the dynamics of their relationship. Is he subservient from the perspective of an "alpha" male, maybe. I'm sure Andrew Tate types would have her smacked into line in no time. Southpark's Alabama Man knows how to deal with such women.
So nothing to do with what I posted. Gotcha.
You guys need to lighten up a bit tbh... Clarkson was just employing his usual bluster and hyperbole and your reaction is ironically:
The man is a ****** *****. It would be a toss up between a cup of tea with Rose West and Clarkson. At least it might be interesting hearing what Fred West was like in private. I know a couple of guys who worked with him for years on building sites around Gloucester, so I heard what he was like in public.
Everything to do with it in the context of the thread. Come on, keep up!
Actually I'd say it's very clear from Clarksons words that is what he meant. As a prince of the UK Harry was literally one of the most powerful men on the planet. He gave that power up for her.
He has on various occasions made statements and comments about protecting his privacy, protecting his immediate family etc. But that is all undone by this constant need for media attention that she then seems to demand. Again supporting she is the dominant, driving force within the relationship.
No you were applying another posters comments to my post.
No he wasn't. He was one of the most privileged men on the planet, there is a huge difference. Monarchists keep telling us how powerless the monarchy is and here you are telling us a prince with zero chance of being king was one of the most powerful men on the planet All he gave up was paid for security, home, servants and some titles and free money.
His problem has always been the British press, I don't blame him, sections of the UK are literal scum. I wouldn't **** on them if they were on fire. They happily ruin lives for paper sales/clicks. The fact he wanted to use his fame on his terms is hardly outrageous. Using his fame for charitable works, Invictus etc is acceptable yes? Having the British tabloids attack your wife constantly in the same way they attacked his mother is likely to **** him off.
Now I'm not saying she is an angel, few are. Is she the evil ***** people make her out to be, I doubt it.
I'd say it's pretty far from interesting wanting to know the private workings of a man who raped, tortured and murdered his own children.
Worrying actually!
You need to understand the term 'soft power'.
You have experience? Please enlighten us.