Harry and Meghan to resign

OK, so Clarkson was a reference to a Game of Thrones episode where it was misogynist - that's acceptable in that adolescent series is it ?
jeez that series probably has a lot more influence on childrens behaviour than Meghan and Harry.

to me, it was a wacky - bodecia derived ? imagery
 
jpaul said:
OK, so Clarkson was a reference to a Game of Thrones episode where it was misogynist - that's acceptable in that adolescent series is it ?
jeez that series probably has a lot more influence on childrens behaviour than Meghan and Harry.

to me, it was a wacky - bodecia derived ? imagery
Click to expand...

Boudicca? Iceni warrior queen.
 
jpaul said:
OK, so Clarkson was a reference to a Game of Thrones episode where it was misogynist - that's acceptable in that adolescent series is it ?
jeez that series probably has a lot more influence on childrens behaviour than Meghan and Harry.

to me, it was a wacky - bodecia derived ? imagery
Click to expand...

Its a bit like how chopping some ones head off in a TV isnt the same thing.

The thing is it isnt just that bit. It was the whole column that was just filled with rage, hatred and bile towards Meghan.
 
Last edited:
Lysander said:
He's using it as an insult, so it's racist [or at least xenophobic].

If you called a black person a black ****, it's not just calling a black person black, you're using their race against them to insult them.
Click to expand...
I think I understand. Context matters and the intent behind it. Like when people say "all these old white men in positions of power". It is said out of spite and used as an insult. Huh interesting.
 
uk.news.yahoo.com

Royal family refuses to condemn Clarkson over 'hateful' Meghan column

Buckingham Palace is yet to issue a statement over the attack on the Royal Family member.
uk.news.yahoo.com uk.news.yahoo.com
Click to expand...

Buckingham Palace has refused to comment on a "hateful" column by Jeremy Clarkson, in which he said he fantasises about Meghan Markle being paraded naked through the streets while crowds throw "excrement" at her.
Click to expand...

www.independent.co.uk

Anger mounts over Camilla lunch attended by Jeremy Clarkson and Piers Morgan

The Queen Consort hosted a star-studded lunch a day before the final volume of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s Netflix docuseries was released
www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk
Click to expand...

The Queen Consort has come under fierce criticism after hosting a lunch reportedly attended by two of her daughter-in-law’s most vocal critics, Piers Morgan and Jeremy Clarkson.

According to reports, Queen Camilla held the glamorous Christmas lunch on Wednesday (14 December), with attendees including Dame Judi Dench, Dame Maggie Smith, and Claudia Winkleman.

The day after the party, Netflix released the final three episodes of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s tell-all documentary series about their time in the royal family.

The following day, on Friday (16 December,), The Sun published a column by Clarkson in which he said he “hates” the duchess.

He wrote that while he “feels rather sorry” for Harry, who he described as a “glove puppet”, his feelings about Meghan were “a different story”.
Click to expand...
 
VincentHanna said:
Don't remember any "rage" or much "hatred" to be honest - People were generally bemused.

I don't recall anyone wanting Elon harm or saying he is worse than serial killers.
Click to expand...

You do get he didn't literally mean that, right? Sometimes people write things that are intended to be funny. Have you ever watched any content by Jeremy Clarkson, you do know he tends to exaggerate for humourous effect? It's like the world is populated by clones of Maude Flanders.
 
Roar87 said:
You do get he didn't literally mean that, right? Sometimes people write things that are intended to be funny. Have you ever watched any content by Jeremy Clarkson, you do know he tends to exaggerate for humourous effect? It's like the world is populated by clones of Maude Flanders.
Click to expand...
Satire died ages ago m8, must be taken 100% seriously nowadays thanks to people using it as a smokescreen for their actual views.
 
Roar87 said:
You do get he didn't literally mean that, right? Sometimes people write things that are intended to be funny. Have you ever watched any content by Jeremy Clarkson, you do know he tends to exaggerate for humourous effect? It's like the world is populated by clones of Maude Flanders.
Click to expand...

so which part do you find funny

the stripping of women naked in public ?

or maybe it then making them walk naked, for the public to hurl abuse at them ?
 
StriderX said:
Satire died ages ago m8, must be taken 100% seriously nowadays thanks to people using it as a smokescreen for their actual views.
Click to expand...

Well, I don't think he likes her, but I don't think he also meant what he said literally. That's called the exaggeration part. It's strange because Jeremy Clarkson is wildly successful and has some of the most popular TV shows around, yet on here almost no one seems to like him. It's almost like this forum doesn't represent people's actual view points.
 
Roar87 said:
Well, I don't think he likes her, but I don't think he also meant what he said literally. That's called the exaggeration part. It's strange because Jeremy Clarkson is wildly successful and has some of the most popular TV shows around, yet on here almost no one seems to like him. It's almost like this forum doesn't represent people's actual view points.
Click to expand...
The odd thing is people are saying he wanted her to be paraded naked etc but ignored the "say shame" part of the article. They were trying to twist something from 5% borderline to 900% over the line.
 
Btone said:
so which part do you find funny

the stripping of women naked in public ?

or maybe it then making them walk naked, for the public to hurl abuse at them ?
Click to expand...

That could be pretty funny, I reckon they need to have a nun of some sort walking behind her rining a bell too:

p7xD66s.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom