Why would we want Hazard? We've got Lingardinho who has now scored and created more than Hazard this season![]()
True, Lingardinho is on form at the moment, proper stepping out the woods moment for him
Why would we want Hazard? We've got Lingardinho who has now scored and created more than Hazard this season![]()
Just what has gone wrong? Will anything change?
If you compare Utd's and City's spending since Pep and JM arrived I think there is a £60m or so difference....
What's gone wrong? Man City. Mourinho's no longer able to just spend a fortune and rely on his percentage tactics to win him the league that's served him so well until now. He's got a rival that can match him financially and more importantly, is doing so much more than just spending money. I mentioned it in the spoilers thread the other day, Pep has taken so many City players on to another level where as I can't think of one Utd player that Mourinho's significantly improved. Furthermore, Pep isn't just playing percentage football - Mourinho's always gone into the big games with a don't lose mentality, believing that if he comes out unscathed he'll win the league in the other games. The problem is there's now too many big matches for that to work and more importantly, Pep and City are going into these games with a winning mentality and actually winning them too.
Mourinho's doing nothing different to what he's done wherever he's been. When things are going well he's the loveable rogue but when things aren't going well it's his players, officials, the board or even the media's fault. And no, nothing will change. When Mourinho rejoined Chelsea we were told he'd changed and things would be different. When he joined Utd we were told he'd changed and things would be different. He's the same **** he's always been.
Things look worse because you're coming directly off a bad week. He might not be doing as well as he has previously but in normal circumstances Utd would be a couple of points off the lead. The concern shouldn't be where you are now but whether, as history suggests, things only get worse.While I don't disagree, Mourinho teams in the second year at least don't generally look this bad against the weaker sides. His tactics in the bigger games I have no issue with, it's more or less what SAF often did.
The big issue I have at the moment is not our league position, it's that we are getting worse as the weeks go by. I can accept Man City are a better side, playing better football and have better players, but we look so very poor. As Man City disppear off into the horizon, we are playing like an average mid table side.
There were shades of Moyes vs Fulham (death by a thousand crosses) against Burnley. That says it all.
The difference in net spend is approximately £30m and that's before you take into account the worlds most expensive free transfer, £16m paid to Pogba's agent and Utd spending £20m per season more in wages. Mourinho pleading poverty is quite frankly embarrassing..
You keep going on about spending not including the likes of KDB but it also doesn't include Martial (for example) who was on a pretty even level with KDB prior to both managers arrivals. The fact that Pep has helped KDB go on to a whole new level whereas Martial's gone backwards is not a stick to hit Pep with..
And btw, I could have sworn that you used to rave about Darmian and claimed he was a superstar.
MOTD clip recently even suggests its £60-70m
KDB also had 2 or three years more senior / consistant experience before Martial even arrived , so Im not sure how that's comparable
I was actually talking as much about the state of both squads and that Man City already had two or three major hitters even before Pep arrived, Martial is very good but his consistency is only improving this season (is that the player , JM / couching or a bit of both?) but he still has a way to go before being at KDB' s current level.
Ive raved over individual games of his but he has never had the consistency required in the EPL to make it over here
Yes we beat arsenal but honestly did we deserve it?
Other than the penalty call on Welbeck, yes lol?
What does deserve mean? Yes, on the balance of play you could argue Arsenal were the better side but they wasted chance after chance and their defence/keeper couldn't keep you out. As a general rule you get exactly what you deserve in football*.Either you didn't watch the match or don't know what deserve means.
Either you didn't watch the match or don't know what deserve means.
What does deserve mean? Yes, on the balance of play you could argue Arsenal were the better side but they wasted chance after chance and their defence/keeper couldn't keep you out. As a general rule you get exactly what you deserve in football*.
*Dodgy decisions aside.
Maybe but on that day your keeper played exceptionally well and Arsenal's forwards and defence didn't, therefore you deserved the win. Imo of course.Deserve it.
"do something or have or show qualities worthy of (a reaction which rewards or punishes as appropriate)."
They hammered us, we just scored on 3 counter attacks. That's how minnows play against the big clubs bevause they don't have the quality to go toe to toe.
On another day where our keeper doesn't produce a miracle performance we would not have won that game.