"Hundreds" of Met Police armed response officers hand in the weapons after colleague charged with murder - Chris Kaba Shooting aftermath.

No ones going to risk doing a 20 stretch for 10,000 squid IMO I reckon the Sun made that up.

Some of these savages will kill people people over drugs debts far less than that.

I'm not saying the alleged reward is true but I think there's a potential threat to the office regardless and I wouldn't be surprised if he's now had to move home etc..
 
Last edited:
oh crap.... was that a recent outburst after the details of the incident were released and the copper was found not guilty............. or was that right after the initial incident.

if it is the former she needs a proverbial head wobble given an innocent man is now in hiding from a contract on his head put out by a criminal gang....... if it is the latter then it was still a poor statement to make (innocent until proven guilty should be a thing for the police as well) but is slightly less infuriating than if she said it now!.
 

Trust a scouser to stand up for the gangster!

BBC has carried on with the woke nonsense:
Black communities in south London are really traumatised and feel they have been denied justice after a police officer was cleared of murdering Chris Kaba, community leaders have said.

About 150 people gathered for a vigil outside the Old Bailey in central London on Monday after jurors returned their verdict.

In Croydon on Tuesday, some residents were reluctant to speak to BBC London about the case, but two community leaders sat down to discuss how people were feeling.

Youth worker Anthony King, who runs a crime reduction organisation in Croydon, said: "What hit me the most is the public decision that was done... now there's a processing that has to take place."

What hit him the most was "the public decision that was done"???

The mother has similar communication issues:

"so what I want... just the justice must done"


I do wonder if half the problem is that some of these people are barely capable of processing what has happened, a bad thing has happened to them and so it must be someone else's fault, there must be some "justice" and of course, a bit of compensation would go down nicely too no doubt!

It does seem incredibly patronising though for everyone else, like the wider black "community" who perhaps weren't raised in the Congo like Chris's mum with a poor education system, poor early childhood nutrition and all the knock-on effects of that when trying to function and raise kids in a more advanced society.

Why does this impact say a black solicitor or a black tesco worker or a black nurse? They've got nothing to do with gangsters and/or encountering armed police in a hard stop.

If this was some old-school white gangster from South or East London getting shot would we be worried about say white working-class Londoners feeling traumatised? It would be a ridiculous thing to worry about yet there is this continuously parroted line about the "community" being impacted heavily by this etc.. the main impact is from race baiters and other grifters trying to stir up tensions/start some more BLM protests.
 
Trust a scouser to stand up for the gangster!

BBC has carried on with the woke nonsense:


What hit him the most was "the public decision that was done"???

The mother has similar communication issues:

"so what I want... just the justice must done"


I do wonder if half the problem is that some of these people are barely capable of processing what has happened, a bad thing has happened to them and so it must be someone else's fault, there must be some "justice" and of course, a bit of compensation would go down nicely too no doubt!

It does seem incredibly patronising though for everyone else, like the wider black "community" who perhaps weren't raised in the Congo like Chris's mum with a poor education system, poor early childhood nutrition and all the knock-on effects of that when trying to function and raise kids in a more advanced society.

Why does this impact say a black solicitor or a black tesco worker or a black nurse? They've got nothing to do with gangsters and/or encountering armed police in a hard stop.

If this was some old-school white gangster from South or East London getting shot would we be worried about say white working-class Londoners feeling traumatised? It would be a ridiculous thing to worry about yet there is this continuously parroted line about the "community" being impacted heavily by this etc.. the main impact is from race baiters and other grifters trying to stir up tensions/start some more BLM protests.
It's all just grift at this point.
 
Horse, stable, door, bolted...

No thanks to the dishonest, woke media (who helped demonise the officer and pandered to the gangster's family & "community") lobbying hard for the name to be released in this case of course but at least future armed officers might be better protected:

Anonymity?

Lol in this day and age? Good luck.
 
I do wonder if half the problem is that some of these people are barely capable of processing what has happened, a bad thing has happened to them and so it must be someone else's fault, there must be some "justice" and of course, a bit of compensation would go down nicely too no doubt!
Yup, they wanted their George Floyd moment and all the grift that goes with it, and now it's not materialising, the toys have gone out of the pram.
Utterly shameless.
 
Well if the police can jail people for posting naughty words on Twitter they can find people breaking this.
This guy already has a bounty on him without 'guaranteed' anonymity, I should think increased stakes means bigger bounties and a lucrative criminal enterprise that I'm sure will be filled.
 
This guy already has a bounty on him without 'guaranteed' anonymity, I should think increased stakes means bigger bounties and a lucrative criminal enterprise that I'm sure will be filled.

Nope. What's the name of the Officer who killed Mark Duggan?

You don't know - and that's how it should be unless convicted.
 
You can't really shoot much lower from the front of the car can you, barely much of anything but head neck and shoulders visible over the steering wheel is there.

That's kinda the point. There only realistic targets are the drivers head and neck. Almost anything else will be covered or ineffective.
 
As with GF, he should have cooperated and if he had he would have still been here but of course facing the consequence of his criminality. Having shot people previously, it was totally feasible that they could be detaining an extremely dangerous individual with the MO of not being put off by using a firearm in a crowded and enclosed place. Therefore it was right they didn't take unnecessary chances with their lives and those of any public that could have been passing. He demonstrated when he should have been surrendering that he had no qualms in rolling the dice at anyone else's expense by driving a vehicle at someone to brute force an escape. They both ultimately brought about their own fate. They actively pursue their criminality without a care for the law and then have the gall to demand how the law should work to satisfy their requirements whilst the rest of the public suffer their criminality. They should toe the line or leave!
 
Last edited:
Presumably they answered these questions about rules of engagement and nature of the shot, in court ... as opposed to above conjecture.
 
As with GF, he should have cooperated and if he had he would have still been here but of course facing the consequence of his criminality. Having shot people previously, it was totally feasible that they could be detaining an extremely dangerous individual with the MO of not being put off by using a firearm in a crowded and enclosed place. Therefore it was right they didn't take unnecessary chances with their lives and those of any public that could have been passing. He demonstrated when he should have been surrendering that he had no qualms in rolling the dice at anyone else's expense by driving a vehicle at someone to brute force an escape. They both ultimately brought about their own fate. They actively pursue their criminality without a care for the law and then have the gall to demand how the law should work to satisfy their requirements whilst the rest of the public suffer their criminality. They should toe the line or leave!

They didn't know it was him driving however they knew the vehicle had been used in a shooting the day before.
 
They didn't know it was him driving however they knew the vehicle had been used in a shooting the day before.
They had a pretty good idea someone dangerous was likely driving it from their intel, otherwise they wouldn't have been following it to do a hard stop with armed officers. The moment he failed to cooperate only further strengthened the likelihood of their intel being correct, it escalated at that point because you can't wait to be shot at first.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom