Forget all that why can't you just admit when you are wrong when you make a statement about webber being good for one race then failing. It would save you a lot of time digging up irrelevant stats that still don't prove you are right when clearly the record book says you're wrong
The facts are that we have had 12 races.
RBR have the best car, so potentially, with the right driver piloting the vehicle can win all the races (or at least share the wins with Vettel).
I stated originally that Webber doesnt have consistency.
12 races
6 podium positions
6 non-podium positions.
He has had 1 DNF which was his fault. He has had the best luck of all the top runners this year. Yet he has an average record. Vettel on the other hand has 2 race wins taken away from him, without it being his fault and is still right up there with Webber.
Enough said.