Lol I really can't tell if these 'lol lewis is too agressive and damages the car' posts are serious.
I hope they aren't otherwise facepalm.
Who said anything about to aggressive.
If you run in the pack and your team mate is out in front. Your car will have far more strain.
Taking out this failure (as we don't know the outcome of the race yet), he's barely lost out at all to Nico in the recent mess-ups, as Nico's failure came in the race and he lost all points. It could be far worse for Hamilton. And with potential storms tomorrow, who knows...
Well **** the bed, you managed to reply to one of my posts without trying to insult me, go you batman. You're still trying to be a smartarse though, but it's a start...Fine, without expletives: If Alonso is available and McLaren can sign him, McLaren will sign him, with or without Button. Alonso decides. Alonso gets.
OK?
Oh the old cliche 'in life you make your own luck', what a crock of turd. How does brake failure, or your car going on fire qualify as YOU making your own luck?In sport (and also in life), you make your own luck.
Its no surprise that the drivers who tend to win many titles are not only lucky, but also great championship drivers. Many say Vettel got very lucky in the last 4 years. Same goes for MSc (when he was winning). Same for Senna (when he was winning).
You make your own luck.
Seriously get real, how can Hamiltons bad luck be classed as nico being more intelligent? Are you telling everyone here that Nicos intelligence will have more of an impact than Hamiltons bad luck, ensuring he starts from the back for two races in a row? Seriously? Would you like to enlighten us all as to when Nicos 'intelligence' forced Hamilton to start from the back of the grid?The problem for Hamilton is not his bad luck. But Nico's intelligence.
No such thing as luck.
Oh the old cliche 'in life you make your own luck', what a crock of turd. How does brake failure, or your car going on fire qualify as YOU making your own luck?
Seriously get real, how can Hamiltons bad luck be classed as nico being more intelligent? Are you telling everyone here that Nicos intelligence will have more of an impact than Hamiltons bad luck, ensuring he starts from the back for two races in a row? Seriously? Would you like to enlighten us all as to when Nicos 'intelligence' forced Hamilton to start from the back of the grid?
I sit back and await your interesting answer
There simply isn't anything called luck. Things happen for one reason or another, be it a mistake, extra wear and tear or what ever.
It's not bad luck he got a defect spark plug bit, it's a defective manufactured part.
Just because you can identify the cause of something happening doesn't negate the bad (or good) luck that it generates for those involved.
Knowing why a plane crashed doesn't stop everyone on board being **** out of luck that they were on that particular flight.
Unless an outcome is the result of an informed and conscious decision by the individual(s) involved then there is an element of chance / luck to that outcome.
he could do with starting in a grid slot rather than the pits, he can take 4 or 5 cars in the first few corners, in the pits he will have to catch the pack first.
unless it rains and he can favour a wet setup
Unless an outcome is the result of an informed and conscious decision by the individual(s) involved then there is an element of chance / luck to that outcome.
Who said anything about to aggressive.
If you run in the pack and your team mate is out in front. Your car will have far more strain.
Probability is not luck, luck does not exist. He isn't having good or bad luck. Everything has happened for a reason.
Why the hell do people talk like luck is an actual thing.
It won't happen though as massa is on a multi year deal at Williams, plus its too much of a risk. Just look at the difference between the car in 2012 and 2013. Who is to say that won't happen again.Alonso ahead of Massa, in a much worse car. Would Williams go for Alonso, would he go to Williams, would they have enough of a budget to afford wages for him?
I really think Williams makes the most sense if Alonso was to move on, fast, moving forward. He has issues with Ron and Mclaren aren't likely to be hugely competitive next year(maybe years afterwards). Massa is massively underperforming and hitting everything out there on track, being spanked silly by a massively less experienced driver. Red Bull, can't see Vettel leaving yet and Ricciardo looks great so don't think RBR would want to dump someone who could be with them for the next 8+ years for someone who has a couple years left.
Just no. If Lewis had pushed his car harder the Nico then his fuel use would be higher. It's not it's lower. But you could say that about the old V8.
And about the word Luck.
It's used as a factor beyond one's control, without regard to one's will, intention, or desired result.
Where's knip? start dancing girl..use the pole the LOT