That's a little bit ignorant, TBF.
Well it's not really. How many monitors are a resolution of 1440p + and native 240hz?.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That's a little bit ignorant, TBF.
Oh I thought the graphics card forum was about framerates in games. I must have missed all the threads people make here about nvidia performance in Microsoft Office.
I use DSR to do 3840x2160 in any game at 240hz. So i can do Rocket League and Overwatch pin sharp with 91ppi (same as 4k 50inch) at 240fps with no blur no lag and i am about 10 years ahead of console bar Raytracing. My only downside is the panel is a TN and not an OLED.
Still need a graphics card for MS Office
If all you do is game then your in the wrong forum.
I dont give a roos poo about consoles. They could be the best gaming experience ever still wouldnt have one as all you can do is game. Every time I've dabbled with a console it only last a month or two then went. Boring.
I do so much more with a PC than you can do on a console and its always been at least a step ahead gaming wise.
That's just my personal opinion.
I played Assassins Creed at 4k on my pc with medium to high settings and I also played it at 1440p at max settings. To be honest I could barely see the difference. The higher resolution seemed to counter the graphic settings.
At 4k on a TV the difference between medium and max settings isn't exactly night and day.
You can get minimum 240fps at 4K in any game? Are you from the future?
Resolution and frame rate do not automatically equal quality. Look at the differences on console vs PC title graphics for things like missing artifacts, substantially less infill and detail, worse quality shadows and models, multiplayer version being significantly worse than single player in quality.. to name a few.
Resolution and frame rate do not automatically equal quality. Look at the differences on console vs PC title graphics for things like missing artifacts, substantially less infill and detail, worse quality shadows and models, multiplayer version being significantly worse than single player in quality.. to name a few.
That is true but they matter up to the point where your personal screens pixels become invisable and the blur goes. So framerate is important and framerate simply removes blur. A lot of people think otherwise because they have never had experience with a zero blur image. You have to bypass the current generation and go back to the days of CRT. And sadly this means 240hz as a minimum. I tested it strobed 120 works as well as 240 native but you lose sync technology to do that.
And playing these Witcher games and Cyberpunks BEFORE this step like a lot of current console owners did is the same as viewing any work of art in poor conditions. Why you might as well go see the Mona Lisa with myopia milk bottle glasses on compared to looking at the same work of art up close with 20/20 vision.
What made The Witcher so well regarded ? Was it the graphics or was it the immersive storyline? I have friends who played it on both console and pc and both of them chatted about the story. They didn't spend too long willy waving over who saw it look its prettiest.
Well that's only 1/2 the story. Although rumored:Then how do you justify a £1000 gpu?
Does everyone suddenly demand 4k 120fps?
I don't really understand what route pc gaming will take. Cyberpunk will be amazing on pc, but if its 4k/60 on a next gen console then why even bother with pc?
The gap seems to be closing and either consoles or things like stadia could finally change the pc gaming world in a way people used to claim for years.
to put it more bluntly, the leap in performance that MS and Sony will make with next gen consoles are going to leave this gen literately in the dust IMHO. And will be able to ray trace on top of that.