Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I'm very interested in what kind of effect nicely clocked SBs will have on the minimum framerate of Arma2. It is perhaps the only game I play where my Q6600 seems to present a bottleneck.
+1 - there is an article on a German site which compares processors max and min framrates for Arrowhead ;
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/...idge/31/#abschnitt_arma_2_operation_arrowhead
Your Q6600 is listed, though not my Q9650 . . .
cjph
So you upgrade to a Sandy Bridge
Upgrade to 2500K available for less than £350 and I will. Hopefully midrange motherboards will be cheap.
Hoping for sub £300.
i agree im a gamer and i cant see a point in upgrading to sandy bridge unless you have to have the best components out there (its not a "who has the dearest pc" is it ??)
i still have a 775socket system with a E6600 cpu and a 7950GT gpu which is terrible but im upgrading to a 1156 socket system with a gtx 460 maybe go lsi with them (in my opinion if you have the money then hell yeah get the best components out there but everything changes every 6 months so i rarely upgrade unless i need to (as i do now)
beasty
I think players of games like Arma2 will benefit greatly from the extra power - I have a 3.7GHz Q9650, admitedly on an ancient motherboard setup, but even clocking a 4890 GPU from 850 core to 950 produced only a 1 fps increase using one of the in-game benchmarks, concluding the primary bottleneck is the CPU. So for me, an overclocked SB at 4.5GHz+ is an attractive option, depending on the funds for a new motherboard, processor, OS and memory. I feel the upgrade itch coming on but can't scratch it at that price.
cjph