Soldato
#finewine
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
#IntelFineWine
Having owned 3dfx, ATi, AMD, nVidia all along the years
Indeed
The A380 is an overclocking monster
With a quick overclock, the A380 gains 40% extra performance, yes 40% not a typo!
Its 40% on average, broken down by game it seems to be anywhere between 20% and 70%, Doom eternal runs 70% faster after overclocking
![]()
'Overclocked' Intel Arc A380 Shows Impressive Gains
Power limits appear to be holding back performancewww.tomshardware.com
Really? The results look more like resize bar off/on.Indeed
The A380 is an overclocking monster
With a quick overclock, the A380 gains 40% extra performance, yes 40% not a typo!
Its 40% on average, broken down by game it seems to be anywhere between 20% and 70%, Doom eternal runs 70% faster after overclocking
![]()
'Overclocked' Intel Arc A380 Shows Impressive Gains
Power limits appear to be holding back performancewww.tomshardware.com
Gamers Nexus did a review on it, and believe they said you need resize bar on for it to work well
Well, the "we bought our own cards" reviews from those German sites are out:
Headline: "Intel Arc A380 im Test: Eine Woche zwischen Lachen und Weinen" (one week between laughing and crying)![]()
Intel Arc A380 (Xe HPG) im Test
Wie gut ist Intel Arc? Der Test einer importierten Arc A380 aus China liefert auch ohne Muster von Intel Antworten auf diese Frage.www.computerbase.de
![]()
Frame pacing is pretty poor:
![]()
RT slowdown isn't that bad (in F1 22):
![]()
Then there's Igor's LAB
![]()
Intel Arc A380 6GB Review: Gunnir Photon including benchmarks, detailed analysis and extensive teardown | igor´sLAB
Finally, the time has come and I can finally offer you the detailed review of the Gunnir Arc A380 6GB Photon, which should provide interesting conclusions and also prospects for the larger models.www.igorslab.de
and Golem
Golem.de: IT-News für Profis
www.golem.de
CB did make a perf/watt table too:
![]()
Something strange about CB's review though: I think they may never have been sample a RTX3050 and subsequently don't have that in there. But even now with GPU prices receding, the 3050 is a lot more expensive than the 6400/6500 or the 1650. Looks Igor and Golem also didn't have a 3050 their suite. A quick look here and elsewhere does have it costing nearly twice what an 6500 XT does, so fair enough.
I just checked on pricing. You're right
The 6500XT is £160
The 3050 is £280
The 3050 is about the same price as the RX 6600 which is way ahead of the 3050 in performance. Its the competitor to the RTX 3060.
All this is just so odd to me, i know the RX 6500XT has come down a little since launch but the 3050 hit the shelves at $450 while the RX 6500XT was always $200, people like Hardware Unboxed said it was worth that while continuing to hate on the RX 6500XT.
While the 6500XT has come under its MSRP the 3050 right now is still over its MSRP, and you know what, they did this, their underselling of the 6500XT and massive up-selling of the 3050 is why this situation exist, and still they claim to be on the side of consumers.
You know what, i can't wait to see the mental gymnastics and clown world insanity these tech journalists will go to to up-sell these Intel cards, or is it just an Nvidia thing with them?