• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285k 'Arrow Lake' Discussion/News ("15th gen") on LGA-1851

oh absolutely, OCUK numbers would be interesting to see

Seems to be a lot of click throughs to the products though, I wonder what is driving that - maybe people checking availability in some cases but overall I suspect they'd actually sell quite a bit at a lower price, possibly people who want to move on from 13th or 14th gen just in case due to the degradation issues and not wanting to go AMD - that kind of stuff seems to have propelled quite a lot of 7800X3D sales lately with people returning 13th and 14th gen out of caution to go AMD.
 
Well, I was working my way round to AMD but having seen how good CUDIMMs are, I am tempted to wait until they become widely available and compatible. If they are as good as they seem to be, then we can expect a wave of them and new supporting CPU's soon. They do sound expensive though.
 
Last edited:
To be fair I've probably clicked thourgh to have a nosey at price initially. And for those who don't keep up to date then yeah they'll still sell.
I was surprised by the rather small size of the enthusiast market when I saw some numbers a long time ago, just how many CPUs are actually sold I don't know
 
To be fair I've probably clicked thourgh to have a nosey at price initially. And for those who don't keep up to date then yeah they'll still sell.
I was surprised by the rather small size of the enthusiast market when I saw some numbers a long time ago, just how many CPUs are actually sold I don't know

True. I don't notice any sudden fall in intel share prices! Arguably, intel have already lost a lot of sales before they introduced this lot. Most enthusiasts will have moved to AMD already. It's quite possible that the buyers they have left are the type that will buy intel no matter what, and never check Youtube. I mean, most people don't buy every generation that comes out, so they will be blissfully unaware that the 15th gen isn't as good as the 14th. All they care about is that it's better than the old 9th gen they just threw in the skip.
 

lol rekt
After 1 week it managed to sold...

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF >5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K >5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF >5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K >10

Looked at AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, the most popular CPU sold over 75,560 units since it went on sale. :eek:
 
After 1 week it managed to sold...

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF >5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K >5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF >5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K >10

Looked at AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, the most popular CPU sold over 75,560 units since it went on sale. :eek:
Yeah and the first week is where all the benchers and hardcore fans buy.

The 9800X3D will do those numbers in seconds.
 
Last edited:
how comes there is no successor to Z299 LGA2066?

its got quad memory channels a high number of PCIe lanes and a lot of gamers and content creators use this platform but no successor and its been 6+ years

This. I have a 9820X at 4.8GHz and no reason to replace it unless it dies. Which it probably will at nearly six year sold. But I want quad-channel RAM.
 
After 1 week it managed to sold...

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF >5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K >5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF >5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K >10

Looked at AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, the most popular CPU sold over 75,560 units since it went on sale. :eek:
Good. I hope they reduce the price although they will probably move more units to OEM customers.
 
For example, say you have an 8 core CPU.
Without HT, you have 8 threads running full speed at say 100% performance.

With HT, you can have 16 threads running all at once, but they will all be running somewhere between 60 and 90% performance.

More work is done, at the expense of threads running slower than if they had the whole core to themselves.

if you have an 8 core system and all 8 are pinned at 100% what you have there is a system that needs a bigger CPU.
if you have a 8c16t system that is running 8 tasks you get 50% utilization of the threads but the 8 cores would be at 100%
and that would be same same

where threads help is if you running 12 tasks each task would have its own pipe line and if the tasks are not maxing out the cores they would run faster than if you only have 8 threads as 4 tasks would have to que to be completed

now we are in a situation(gaming) where the new cores run faster than the old ones but the performance is lower... the only differance is the number of threads.

if you have 8 full power cores and your running a game at 100% in 4 of them, but there iss the other tasks running in the background they have 4 full power cores to run them too...
BUT, if you have a 4Pc / 4Ec CPU and the game is maxing out 4 Pc the same as before would the 4Ec be able to keep up with the other takes in the same way the other cpu could.. the answer is simple and no as there not as fast and dont carry the full instruction set and a full power core dose

based on what we see from AMD and intel's last gen i would take 8c/16t over 8pc/8ec any day and that applies to 8pc/20ec too because a last gen 8c/16t CPU handed the new flagship is own ass
i mean in a few games it lost badly to the 5800x3d
again this is gaming***
 
Last edited:
True. I don't notice any sudden fall in intel share prices!

Apart from the 35% drop on one day in August of course, and down ~60% since the start of the year.

Arrowlake will be bought plenty though I think, just not by gamers. It's still a solid productivity chip with competitive pricing for non-gaming workloads, a good all-rounder for > 80% of the consumers out there.
 
Back
Top Bottom