Associate
51 seconds for the 1m time is ok. I was hoping for better performance from these but they are dual core so potentially any performance is doubled if used right
Iam sitting on a Socket 754 Sempron @2.5ghz (similar budget performance tuning thing) and it does it in 42 secs with a best of 38 so far.
Superpi heavily relys on the memory timings so its just a simple test.
Even my socket A could do 38 secs so none of this is blistering times, but I guess the whole deal relys on that dual core making windows multitask nicer - superpi does not test that, unless you run two seperate instances at once?
Sorry thought you meant 111seconds then hehe. 51 is not fast but sounds right for stock speed of this processor, its bottom of the range after all
Do any games use dual core ? This processor choice only works if you can overclock it to the extremes, a nice challenge
Iam sitting on a Socket 754 Sempron @2.5ghz (similar budget performance tuning thing) and it does it in 42 secs with a best of 38 so far.
Superpi heavily relys on the memory timings so its just a simple test.
Even my socket A could do 38 secs so none of this is blistering times, but I guess the whole deal relys on that dual core making windows multitask nicer - superpi does not test that, unless you run two seperate instances at once?
sweat69 said:the setting was on 1m the time it did it in was 51 secs.
Sorry thought you meant 111seconds then hehe. 51 is not fast but sounds right for stock speed of this processor, its bottom of the range after all
gam3r said:im pondering this route as well...but 2 GB of Geil DDR2 ram instead for a gaming rig. Is this wise?
Do any games use dual core ? This processor choice only works if you can overclock it to the extremes, a nice challenge
Last edited: