based on?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Intel has a Pretty Big Problem..
- Thread starter Purgatory
- Start date
Mostly AMD having much better hardware.
Caporegime
In germany maybe from one website, AMDs market share is still tiny
AMD gains big in desktop CPUs versus Intel in first quarter 2024
Recent market share data shows that while Intel's Core Ultra has proven a mild success, AMD is stealing share in desktop processors.www.pcworld.com
Gloabally...
whats the source of the above image? Because mine was based on a Research companies stats and even according to that graph AMD aren;t outselling intel or they would be gaining in the last 2 years.
what did someone say out selling intel by 4 to 1
INTC is only in trouble in peoples minds
what did someone say out selling intel by 4 to 1
INTC is only in trouble in peoples minds
Last edited:
they had profit just not after investment in fabs etc.
which is why intels net assets has been growing.
people still don't get it... they spent way more on RND and building fabs than they need to, not making profit overall is a choice.
it's not because they are failing.
this thread just goes around in circles, a few pages back I compare intels RND compared to other tech companies.
You could argue a lot of that RND money is wasted, since intels rnd budget is ridiculous
Last edited:
Permabanned
nvidia have cpu's also.
if or when they decide to enter the 'consumer' market that will be another competitor.
complacency is a one way ticket to the big L
TSMC spend up big on their fabs. this infrastructure isn't cheap.
if or when they decide to enter the 'consumer' market that will be another competitor.
complacency is a one way ticket to the big L
TSMC spend up big on their fabs. this infrastructure isn't cheap.
Last edited:
Google , amazon , microsoft and meta are all making or already have their own Cpus too
not spending as much as intel are
Permabanned
I found one in my rice Krispies this morning. 
Last edited:
Associate
Ive just updated to the latest bios and the 0x12b microcode. Big performance increase in cinebench as the power limits I'd set to 180w had been removed, but it did run cooler than before when they were at 253w. Voltage does go up to 1.41v though. I thought that it would've stayed lower than that. It was going up to 1.45v before with the previous bios/microcode.
Associate
I spoke too soon. Voltage has been going up to 1.452v. No improvement on the previous bios/microcode.
Retail/etail boxed sales* In the rainforest market place top 20 selling CPUs Intel have 2 parts and 0 in the top 10…
Intel are spending other peoples money.
I guess this is the source:
Intel/AMD x86 computer CPU market share 2024 | Statista
In the third quarter of 2024, roughly 62 percent of x86 computer processor or CPU tests recorded were from Intel processors, while 35.5 percent were AMD processors.
www.statista.com
Though this was omitted from the screenshot, it seems to be calculating market share from CPU tests whatever that is.
Soldato
Question is, was it Intel and did it go snap.. crackle.. pop!I found one in my rice Krispies this morning.
Associate
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D rumored for early November launch, Intel confirms Core Ultra 200 will be about 5% slower than 7000X3D - VideoCardz.com
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D incoming According to the rumors, AMD could present their highly anticipated X3D processor right after Intel launches its new series. Chiphell members are discussing the potential launch date for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. A rumor cites now-deleted comments from an AMD...
videocardz.com
"could according to rumours" that probably started on the internet for clicks.
Hardly going to be more accurate than a research companies stats, which is what I linked.
so based on people who run things like 3dmark/futuremark whatever they call it these days and the people who click verify on apps like cpu-z
Hardly going to be more accurate than a research companies stats, which is what I linked.
Last edited:
Permabanned
"Intel are spending other peoples money."
that's always a winning strategy. I try to spend others' money as often as possible.
...eg. the clients' money, the banks's money, the renters' money. the customers' money. but not my money. no I'll lock that up in a ponzi asset scheme (with tax deductibles) or in a high interest bank account.
I don't compete. I just do what I do. the more i'm pushed the slower I perform.
grants moneys usually don't need to be paid back., which in the case of CHIPS Act grants, if true, is a sweet deal.
that's always a winning strategy. I try to spend others' money as often as possible.
...eg. the clients' money, the banks's money, the renters' money. the customers' money. but not my money. no I'll lock that up in a ponzi asset scheme (with tax deductibles) or in a high interest bank account.I don't compete. I just do what I do. the more i'm pushed the slower I perform.
grants moneys usually don't need to be paid back., which in the case of CHIPS Act grants, if true, is a sweet deal.
Last edited:
"Intel are spending other peoples money."
that's always a winning strategy. I try to spend others' money as often as possible.
I don't compete. I just do what I do. the more i'm pushed the slower I perform.
grants moneys usually don't need to be paid back., which in the case of CHIPS Act grants, if true, is a sweet deal.
Intel have anything but a winning strategy right now.
Soldato
I guess this is the source:
Intel/AMD x86 computer CPU market share 2024 | Statista
In the third quarter of 2024, roughly 62 percent of x86 computer processor or CPU tests recorded were from Intel processors, while 35.5 percent were AMD processors.
Though this was omitted from the screenshot, it seems to be calculating market share from CPU tests whatever that is.
The "CPU tests" are almost certainly Geekbench, because Statista lists it as a source.
We all know of course how fair and unbiased Geekbench is
