• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***Intel i7 4790K Owners thread***

Associate
Joined
8 Jul 2009
Posts
132
Is the turbo auto-boosted voltage always indicative of the overclocking potential? Turbo load (4.4) voltage is 1.26v and non-turbo load voltage (4.0) is 1.1v. These seem high? Gigabyte gaming 7 is the MB.
 
Associate
Joined
18 Nov 2014
Posts
185
probably a little high. Those seem like conservative voltages.
i've got 2 profiles
1) 3900 @ 1.03V which is stable (think IBT/prime couple of hours)
2) 4700 @ 1.29 again stable

for 4.6 i need 1.23, and I know my chip isn't all that good.

You can try voltages yourself and shoot for 4.6, which should be attainable on most 4790k's.
 
Associate
Joined
4 Aug 2008
Posts
653
Location
North East
I wouldn't be too worried about a 60ish temp from these chips.

When mine is folding at 100% and the turbo boost kicks in I can hit mid 70's most the time, hot room will hit around mid 80's etc

Chip has taken it since I've owned it. Used to have a H100i on it until the 3rd pump died in a year so binned it and stuck a Phantek TC14 heatsink on it.
 
Associate
Joined
18 Nov 2014
Posts
185
60-70's is actually ok with 4790k. Problems get around mid/high 80's.
mine at 4.7 @ 1.29 is a heater - low 80's (and it's delided and naked die water cooling). That is under IBT. Under AIDA 64 it barely breaks mid 70's, and Realbench is even lower.
 
Associate
Joined
18 Nov 2014
Posts
185
was a little scared the liquid pro would goon the sides of the cpu.
I had liquid pro between chip and IHS when i was using the IHS, but naked now.
There's Gelid extreme 5 on it at the moment. I might put liquid pro on it, the next time I redo my loop.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Posts
3,774
Location
Yorkshire
It doesnt go anywhere if ya dont use too much, ya only really smearing a tiny bit on to make it shiny, ive seen some people using it like normal paste and wondering why its going everywhere.
 
Associate
Joined
18 Nov 2014
Posts
185
i know hot to apply it, watched their video on youtube and i applied it every time on core perfectly, it just takes like 5-10 minutes of me being careful, slow and steady. That or 30 seconds with any other paste that you "strap-on" and just smear a little.

i have a rubber "gasket" on the pcb, and the only thing that sticks out is the core(helps with applying pressure evenly when tightening the screws on the waterblock)
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Posts
3,774
Location
Yorkshire
Yeah i always used to make my own spacer to protect the die and cool it directly, but on my z77 board i had before this the stuff around the socket stood too high to allow good contact with the cooler though, so with this z97 i didnt even bother trying it, just threw the IHS back on.
 
Soldato
Joined
16 Jan 2006
Posts
3,021
60-70's is actually ok with 4790k. Problems get around mid/high 80's.
mine at 4.7 @ 1.29 is a heater - low 80's (and it's delided and naked die water cooling). That is under IBT. Under AIDA 64 it barely breaks mid 70's, and Realbench is even lower.

What sort of problems do you mean?
 
Associate
Joined
21 Mar 2016
Posts
6
Location
Nr Swindon
Currently at 4.9GHZ, 1.29V <70c with an H110i, had it briefly stable at 5.0GHZ but at 1.4V/80-85c which makes me nervous for 24/7. Will boot into W10 at 5GHZ/1.3V hangs during CINEBENCH CPU test...

Any suggestions for breaking 5.0GHZ without upping VCore??? - more HERE

CPUZ System Validation - http://valid.x86.fr/cn7i63

Benchmark%20pic_zpsy9cv14jv.jpg


***Anyone know how I can re-size my image on the forum, it seems to have been shrunk somewhat from the original!***

POV-Ray v3.7 Results

CPU time used: kernel 0.28 seconds, user 1032.41 seconds, total 1032.69 seconds.
Elapsed time 137.56 seconds, CPU vs elapsed time ratio 7.51.
Render averaged 1905.66 PPS (253.85 PPS CPU time) over 262144 pixels using 8 thread(s).

ROG Realbench 2.43 Results

Image Editing: 202113
Time: 25.174

Encoding: 156925
Time: 61.099

OpenCL: 63941
KSamples/sec: 1496

Heavy Multitasking: 162337
Time: 60.245

System Score: 133540
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
25 Jun 2009
Posts
3,458
Location
Weston-super-Mare
Sounds about right. You need crazy increases in vcore when you are at the chips limits.

I'd drop the idea of running it 24/7 @ 5ghz, and just be thankful you are able to get that sweet 4.9ghz overclock.
 
Back
Top Bottom