I totally prefer the aspect ratio of the mini over the nexus but then again, I don't intend to use it for movies.
[TW]Fox;23101156 said:Whereas I will pretty much use it only for watching video and browsing the web on trains etc.
That's understandable. Surely if that's the case the Nexus 7 is perfect?
[TW]Fox;23101504 said:It would be, if it didn't feel every bit as cheap as its price tag suggested.
I hate cheap feeling stuff.
[TW]Fox;23101156 said:Whereas I will pretty much use it only for watching video and browsing the web on trains etc.
That doesn't really make sense though - portrait 4:3 is far more suited to browsing webpages and reading books/magazines than 16:9 will ever be. That's the primary purpose of an iPad... not watching movies.
[TW]Fox;23101156 said:Whereas I will pretty much use it only for watching video and browsing the web on trains etc.
[TW]Fox;23101633 said:It makes perfect sense as I watch a lot of media on the move. I'm completely used to browsing the web in 16:9 as I do so on my desktop.



For a non-Apple afficionado, can someone explain what a bonded screen is?
Well, I just had a play with one at the Apple Store and I'm sorely tempted now.
The weight of the thing surprised me most, my iPad 2 now feels like a brick in comparison. It's literally half the weight (601g vs 308g), which surprised me as in hand it felt a similar weight to my 4S (140g). There's a big plus for reading in bed
The screen. I've never used a retina iPad, so as a direct comparison to the iPad 2 the higher density is a winner. Type looked just as good, pictures looked just as good, and the smaller tap targets aren't a problem for someone who's had iPhones forever.
Like I say, I'm sorely tempted![]()
can someone please do some iPad mini screenshots of the following:
home screen
safari running BBC news website and Apple store website
you can upload them via http://upit.me/
Thanks![]()