ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.

HPTL7 said:
Let me guess, you watched the first 30 seconds.
I was referring to the way they explained how the Federal reserve bank works
Click to expand...

Come on now, it was hardly an explanation of how the Federal Reserve worked, it was a bias, anti America, pro-ISIL video.

The last few minutes were particularly entertaining, it's about time we committed ground troops to put those daeshbags down. What's with the fascination of having the equivalent of Westlife boys singing songs about heroism anyway? "For the sake of Allah we will march to gates, of the paradise where our maidens await" :D Amazing, but also quite saddening that people can be so brainwashed by make-believe.
 
RoboCod said:
Come on now, it was hardly an explanation of how the Federal Reserve worked, it was a bias, anti America, pro-ISIL video.

The last few minutes were particularly entertaining, it's about time we committed ground troops to put those daeshbags down. What's with the fascination of having the equivalent of Westlife boys singing songs about heroism anyway? "For the sake of Allah we will march to gates, of the paradise where our maidens await" :D Amazing, but also quite saddening that people can be so brainwashed by make-believe.
Click to expand...

Type How the Federal reserve bank works anywhere, YouTube for example.
Are those 100 videos+ pro IS too?
 
RoboCod said:
Ah so why didn't you say that in the first place, because that applies to Syria too. If we're going to state he isn't commiting to fighting ISIL in Iraq then the same applies to Syria and surely you see the problem in that.

So what's your point?
Click to expand...

the comment was about Iraq - re read the post - it was in reply to this statement: "but you'd think the USA would have some influence in the Iraqi government who should be furious"

the Iraqi govt is onside with Iran and Russia - they're Shia dominated

You do realise the decision not to apply troops to ground has largely been down to lack of public appetite? The idea was that the Iraqi Army sorted their turf out, along with the US air support. Unfortunately, they've largely been unsuccessful since much of the IA us inexperienced and also lacking appetite to fight.
Click to expand...

That's part of the reason but the other consideration is as I outlined before, the US not wanting to take sides in a sectarian conflict, they didn't want to just join in with the Iraqi govt & Iran and try to take Sunni areas on behalf of the Shia regime - that is why so far the bombing campaign has been relatively limited.
 
HPTL7 said:
No, and I do not see why you think that. I am talking about the federal bank and the way it works...
All those videos on youtube mean that all those people are now pro Isil cause they bash the federal bank system?
Click to expand...

No, that is clearly not what I'm saying. The video you posted is quite clearly pro ISIL though.
 
RoboCod said:
No, that is clearly not what I'm saying. The video you posted is quite clearly pro ISIL though.
Click to expand...

Indeed it is, the reason I posted it was because I thought people would want to see it the way they portrayed it all. Obviously they add in all their 'everyone must be killed, we want our virgins bla bla'.
 
The Russian-backed ISIS forces are now gaining momentum as they advance towards Aleppo:

BEIRUT, Lebanon — The Islamic State registered significant gains Friday in the area of northwestern Syria that Russian warplanes have been bombing heavily, taking six villages near Aleppo and threatening to cut off an important route north to the Turkish border.

Late in the day, there were reports that rebels had reasserted control in one of the villages.

...“Daesh has exploited the Russian airstrikes and the preoccupation of the Free Syrian Army in its battles in Hama, and advanced in Aleppo,” one rebel commander with fighters in the region told Reuters.
Click to expand...

(Source).
 
Last edited:
scorza said:
What makes you think Islamic State will be next? A strong Islamic State is key to Russia/Assad's strategy of winning the war.
Click to expand...

Err no?? Russians want weak ISIS and weak FSA at each other throats. By no means are Russians going to prep up ISIS, to then be faced with having to challenge them head on.

This is getting ridiculous now... I understand the whole "Russia is bad" and the idea that "Russia is supporting/helping ISIS" Is exactly what we need to demonize Russia into the "Empire of Evil" but seriously, this is beyond tin-foil level.

As of now, West and its Allies have supported ISIS more than anyone through indirect means, you can argue that the creation of ISIS is a sole fault of multiple failed operations in middle east conducted by the NATO so much so that its hard to believe that given amount of intelligence and capabilities of NATO that this was a mere "accident". But hey, this is tin-foil right? Russia backing ISIS and making them best buddies isnt.
 
Hmm, far from the 30+ years UK politicians and military brass claimed the anti isis fight was gona take Putin's on track to do it in 30 days.

Perhaps we should ask him to investigate our institutionalised paedophilia which seems to be spread throughout our security services and I include the propaganda arm the bbc in those security organisations.
 
thep02 said:
Hmm, far from the 30+ years UK politicians and military brass claimed the anti isis fight was gona take Putin's on track to do it in 30 days.

Perhaps we should ask him to investigate our institutionalised paedophilia which seems to be spread throughout our security services and I include the propaganda arm the bbc in those security organisations.
Click to expand...

Are you actually insane?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom