Italian Grand Prix 2014, Monza - Race 13/19

Jesus people, it's badly written, or I should say well written troll bait.

Almost certainly what the truth will be is the main engine guy will tell them when it's safe to push the engine harder. If you push overtake mode the whole time you'll have a hotter engine with less life in it.

The article fails to mention that both Mercedes drivers throughout the entire season have been told not to use the overtake button, or more commonly, you can use the overtake button now, for x number of laps or we've heard say towards the end of a race, you can use it till the end.

Mercedes themselves are limited by the people making that call. The engines both have to survive, have to do multiple races and fuel is an issue. With the number of times they've been released to use overtake at the end of a race it's very likely to do with fuel saving as well, IE if you stay in that mode you won't make the end due to fuel usage.

I don't for a second think that a team would be paying anywhere from £5-8mil an engine(I've not seen any certain numbers, just guesses saying Ferrari were the cheapest, Renault the most expensive and various rumours of prices) that they would pay for one where the lead manufacturer can deny them BHP on a whim throughout the season. How many times has Hamilton been stuck behind one or both Williams, how many times have the Merc's been unable to pass them with DRS because the Williams are pushing full pelt down the straights? If Merc could tell them to not use the overtake button to defend, every one of those passes would be as easy as Vettel on Vergne/Riccy last season.

But again the fact that Hamilton and Rosberg have numerous times all year been told to not use overtake mode, or that they can use it for a few laps now, etc. It's a limit ALL the teams have and him putting it that way is serious click bait to get hits.

Also, seriously jaybee, you couldn't just quote the relevant paragraph?

Each team, including Ferrari, RBR and Merc, have a lead guy for pretty much everything. If the brakes guy tells the race engineer to tell his driver to cool the brakes, the drivers cool the brakes, if they say save fuel or you won't make it, they save fuel, if the engine guy says, you're operating at unsafe temps, you turn the engine down. Trying to suggest this is new, exclusive to Merc customer teams and that it's an unfair advantage that only the customers put up with is ridiculous.

Williams are likely just the most limited on the overtake button due to the fact they seem to under fuel... heavily. They have since the start of the season shown significantly lower fuel usage than even Hamilton, where the Merc beats out every other car and Hamilton beats out Rosberg in fuel efficiency, the Williams are another step up in efficiency. There is no chance they aren't under fuelling as part of their general strategy, meaning they will certainly be least capable of using the least efficient engine modes as a result. That is a tactical choice on the part of Williams.
 
Last edited:
When Nico went off at Monaco then this forum in general decided it was done on purpose, yet when he does it at Monza (twice) then it's cause he is hopeless.....
 
It wouldn't have been hard for Rosberg to brake a few metres later which would mean the telematry would be fine if it was looked at. I mean at 220mph when under pressure it would be easy to accept that he braked a little later and got it wrong. I say all this though and I don't think he did it on purpose as any kind of punishment the Merc handed down.

Put the tinfoil hats away, folks. Nico made an identical mistake at Canada while under pressure. It's part of his style to push hard when someone is catching him and sometimes he overdoes it.
 
When Nico went off at Monaco then this forum in general decided it was done on purpose, yet when he does it at Monza (twice) then it's cause he is hopeless.....

Yes because logic and common sense dictate so, you're using context to ignore the difference by acting like they were the same action.

In qualifying he had something to gain, pole, in this race he had nothing to gain but a win to lose.

It also wasn't that he went off at Monaco, it was the deliberate reversing onto a track while qualifying was live. If he messed up the corner on purpose or not, reversing onto the track when you have nothing left to do on track and others are involved in qualifying still is both deliberate and unmistakeable intent.
 
When Nico went off at Monaco then this forum in general decided it was done on purpose, yet when he does it at Monza (twice) then it's cause he is hopeless.....
One instance benefit him, whilst the other hindered him :confused:

Stopping Q3 when you're on provisional pole is always going to look shady. If he'd been P4, it wouldn't even be an issue.
 
......
Also, seriously jaybee, you couldn't just quote the relevant paragraph?
.........

lol sorry. It's just someone above said they were having trouble reading the whole article. I posted it for their benefit mostly.

Well...I don't think it's "badly written". Is it? To me it reads that the writer Mark Hughes, is under the impression that Williams have to ask Mercedes each time they want to use the overtake button to boost engine revs/performance. I think he's wrong and this is completely false.
 
I think he knows precisely what is happening, that the engine consultant, who is a merc employee because he knows more than everyone else, is giving genuine advice on when not to push the engine too hard, like every single team has a similar dude giving them advice on every single part of the car. He's trying to make it sound like the Mercedes team, through this merc employee, gets to dictate how hard they can fight against Williams.

I think he knows exactly what the reality is but worded in an obtuse way, leaving out specific facts and even mentioning it makes it sound like Merc didn't give them permission to fight back. I think it's the way many "journalists" are going these days... think gamergate, mostly just bloggers who want controversy to get hits rather than accuracy.

If he didn't know what he was doing, he's just a woeful journalist because of the times I mentioned where both Williams cars have cost Hamilton points and made it impossible to pass them, also the frequency with which both Merc drivers are told they can't use overtake mode. You have to be completely inept to not see that or the guy was purposefully trying to create controversy where there is none, I presume it's the later but either would make him a crap journalist.
 
I don't know if this has been posted, but Ferrari really seem in a right state these days.

Ferrari chairman Luca di Montezemolo made a characteristically swaggering appearance at Monza on Saturday, affirming that he will decide if and when he leaves Ferrari, but last night the boss of Ferrari’s parent company FIAT Chrysler said that enough was enough and that “no -one is indispensable”.
 
The CTs claiming Rosberg was ordered to let Hamilton win even if he took pole are as lolworthy as the CTs claiming the team have been intentionally borking Hamilton's car all season to allow a German driver to win.
 
because it's silly season and people like to join in the silliness. 95% chance neither will leave.

Agreed, though I would put the figure closer to 99%.

Merc have told their drivers that nothing is guaranteed for next season, just to keep the 2 drivers on their best behaviour. This is a standard tactic used by all firms (when they want to bring their badly behaved staff, back in line).

Rosberg must continue with the mind-games if he is to have a chance of the title. If he ever enters into a speed based competition, he will lose 9/10. He needs to use his intelligence and engineer a method to beat Hamilton.
 
Rosberg just needs to keep coming second and see how the reliability game plays out, it's his only real hope. A big deal is made of Rosbergs mindset post monza but I think for once EJ had it right. He has never gone particularly well there so is probably relieved to have come 2nd.

Still I see nothing other than a Hamilton title win since the last prediction thread. Nothing that's happened so far has changed that. I think he might even win it on double points.
 
Last edited:
Clearly Nico's punishment for Spa was to let Lewis win at Monza. Shame really but hopefully he is free to win from now on.

Even if that's the case Nico has still 'gained' 11pts from Spa.

A more sensible conclusion was that Mercedes ordered Nico to yield position simply because he was much slower than Hamilton and they didn't want another tangle. If Nico had just slowed down and let him past like Massa did with Alonso back in the day there would have been uproar and a PR disaster for Mercedes. The teams always come first in F1, the drivers championship is just a side show for fans to wet themselves over.
 
Last edited:
A more sensible conclusion was that Mercedes ordered Nico to yield position simply because he was much slower than Hamilton and they didn't want another tangle. ...

Not saying you believe it - since you mention it simply being a more sensible conclusion - but there's no way surely for the team to in fact give this order undetected? Over the radio this would have been picked up since they can broadcast any of the messages they intercept for the feed. There is also no way this could have been planned before the race since they can't possibly account for the situation where Lewis was hunting Nico down in that manner, in that situation, having caught him mid way through the race, having lost the lead and to come back through.

The only possible thing they could have said is something like a general "if EITHER of you are leading then" ...bla bla bla. But...this goes against everything they have been saying as a team and that is that they can race, but "use your brain" as Lauda said before the race.

There was a race and Rossberg made an error. That's it.
 
A more sensible conclusion was that Mercedes ordered Nico to yield position simply because he was much slower than Hamilton and they didn't want another tangle. If Nico had just slowed down and let him past like Massa did with Alonso back in the day there would have been uproar and a PR disaster for Mercedes. The teams always come first in F1, the drivers championship is just a side show for fans to wet themselves over.

Personally I think it was aliens.
 
I love conspiracy theories, but I doubt any team would sabotage their own car, to ensure it gets a slow start.

I do wonder though: what was Nico's punishment?
Some people say that it was to let Hamilton win the next race (ie Monza)?
 
Wow. When a guy at work earlier said "Have you seen all the conspiracy theories saying that Nico let Hamilton past?" I thought he was joking. Have I woken up in America by accident?

Some within the industry say it was a fine or wages dock, which is plausible. Would seem the most logical and commonly used method in modern sports.

I'm guessing you all watched the BBC coverage then? Sky mentioned a few times that they had been told it was a 200,000 Euro fine.

Whilst I agree with your points, the questions I would ask you are these:

Who is paying? Might that meant they have quite some clout when it comes to choosing drivers?

Presumably Petronas, and the other sponsors each driver brings. While Mercedes own the team, it isn't funded wholly from their back pockets.
 
Back
Top Bottom