All the TPs saying DQ due to safety. Yet sending a car out knowing the body work wasn't attached was a drive though. No one was calling for more on that.
Surely 0.3psi when it comes to a pressure reading is pretty small and open to being close to a 'margin of error'?
All the TPs saying DQ due to safety. Yet sending a car out knowing the body work wasn't attached was a drive though. No one was calling for more on that.
If Mercedes can prove that the data they have shows them seeing Hamilton's pressures all being correct throughout the race, how do they know for sure who's instruments are totally accurate?
Surely 0.3psi when it comes to a pressure reading is pretty small and open to being close to a 'margin of error'?
About 1.5% so easily within the margin of error in my view, especially if they just use a standard valve gauge which releases a little air in the process of taking its reading.
How likely are they to be using a £5 piece of tech that actually reduces a tire pressure through use to decide things in a multi billion pound sport.
Lowe has been quoted as saying they checked their pressures under supervision by Pirelli. If that's the case, then how on earth the FIA can check them shortly thereafter on the grid, with a gauge calibrated by Pirelli, and claim they're not right, is beyond me.
So the tyre was technically unsafe.
So the FIA delegate and the Pirelli supervising personnel decided to let multiple cars, with technically unsafe tyres, not only start the race but complete their first stint without notifying anyone.
Huh....