Forgot to mention no one is taking into account the fact its takes around 6kwh to refine 3.8 litres of unleaded that is frankly horrendous.
Burning fossil fuels to make fossil fuels....
So around 10% of the resultant refined energy source?
That has always been around the throughput cost for an oil refinery. I have always felt that Oil refining is a perfect application for Nuclear reactors.
A nice steady supply of process heat at around 400C, month in, month out. Just what Nuclear reactors love.
Pretty much anything you touch has burnt a fossil fuel for it to have appeared, e.g. if you eat asparagus or bananas they use tonnes of fuel to import them etc.. I expect you can't even give birth these days without wasting some form of limited fuel
There is no winning side, especially not the planet.
I think the question should be is what are we going to do with all the spare unleaded and diesel once the majority of people are using electric. Lets face it were still going to be refining huge quantities of oil as we need marine fuel, aviation fuel and other by products i.e. plastic.
Electric isn't going away, most European countries want to ban ICE cars by 2030.
Ban, or ban sales of new ICE engined vehicles?Electric isn't going away, most European countries want to ban ICE cars by 2030.
and how long would it take to charge a electric car with the typical amount of solar panels on a roof of your home?
It doesn't work like that, you never use it yourself. You sell it to the grid at 42p/kWh and buy some other back at 11p/kWh. Nothing but a bill-payer-subsidised financial scam.
It doesn't work like that, you never use it yourself. You sell it to the grid at 42p/kWh and buy some other back at 11p/kWh. Nothing but a bill-payer-subsidised financial scam.
Ban, or ban sales of new ICE engined vehicles?
A total ban would be difficult to implement until the vast majority of vehicles on the road were electric.
Oil is not going to run out anytime soon, not in my life time nor my great great grandkids
It would have to be banned first or a complete alternative that makes oil useless.
New sales rather than complete ban.
Its expected that new EV sales will hit 10% of all car sales in 2020 and basically waterfall from there. The last few % will be difficult as there are use cases where a P100D is still not suitable.
They will miss that target my a long way. EVs are still far to expensive for what you get. Plus the only ones petrol heads pay any attention to are Tesla.
For us though, this is a second car to take the slack of driving locally - which amount to the majority of our currently driving. It was also incredibly good value - and hopefully will continue to be cheap and good value for many years to come.![]()
They will miss that target my a long way. EVs are still far to expensive for what you get. Plus the only ones petrol heads pay any attention to are Tesla.
Doesn't sound that cheap... £6 for 60 miles? A 2.0L or smaller diesel will do that without much trouble while keeping to the speed limit.
When it comes to actual cost... won't the battery life make the car useless a long time before a small diesel engine would stop functioning... making the actual cost and general wastage higher?
It's like people who do naff all miles buying a 5.0 V8 to drove around in, the fuel costs are irrelevant as they are going nowhere, if they were doing 20k a year it's a big issue, but for 5kpa?