I was replying to Sunama who bascially said Mclaren have lost their mojo when it comes to winning, which he was clearly wrong about as even all the Hamilton fan boys will back me up when I say that Mclaren were the fastest team in 2012. Reliability lost them the Championship... so sunama's "risk averse" summary is completely unfounded and frankly, falsified.
WOW. Falsified.
Are we in a Court of law?
Your honour - he falsified his statement.
Dude, you are taking this way too seriously.
We certainly know that McLaren had (arugably) the best car in 2012. Had Vettel or Alonso been in that car, I think they'd have won the title. But thats my opinion.
In Winter 2012, clearly things didnt go well.
Hamilton must've seen what was to come and left.
McLaren responded by replacing a top line driver with Perez (this shows the team have now lost their ambition).
They start 2013 badly and continue the season in the same way. No forward movement. This suggests that they are either bad at developing the car (which I do not believe) OR they are not taking enough risks.
They had the opportunity this year to weigh in and attempt to destabilize and possibly hire either Kimi or Alonso. They got neither. I dont think they even made an attempt to hire them.
Ferrari on the other hand want to win at any cost. They already have a top line driver. But at the risk of ruffling feathers, they have got themselves another top line driver. Some have said that Kimi/Alonso pairing is one of the strongest pairing ever.
Since 2013, McLaren have shown no evidence of a team which has ambitions to win the title. They appear to be hoping that their design team comes up with a car which 0.5s faster than everybody elses...but the chances of this happening are slim.
To win the title, they need a top line driver. Perhaps they accept that they are not good enough to offer a top driver a decent drive. Who knows.