JOKER 2: Folie à Deux

I think the whole musical aspect of this is going to put off people from going to see it on the big screen.
Im more put off by it seemingly being a court case drama with parts filmed in Arkem, I wanted to keep the theme it ended on the end of the last one, with the Joker being a reflection of Gotham's break in society etc.
 
Im more put off by it seemingly being a court case drama with parts filmed in Arkem, I wanted to keep the theme it ended on the end of the last one, with the Joker being a reflection of Gotham's break in society etc.
Yeah this is not a film for me. Very rare to like this court style.

I actually really like gaga both musically and in a few films. But I don't think the combo works here.

Saw the trailer last night in cinema.. Not for me.
 
I don't have a problem with it being a musical, some of the best movies pre-70's are musicals. And i love Mulian Rouge and The Greatest Show.

But it does have to have a great story behind it
 
Musical movies can work. Phantom of the Opera. The greatest Showman etc . This I am not sure. One of the few I think I will miss in the Cinema.
 
I agree it didn't need a sequel, but some people just don't enjoy musicals and so immediately hate.

I said before, i was blown away by Evita in the cinema, yet 3/4 walked out. If it's crap, it's crap, but i'll give it a watch.
 
Last edited:
musical.. for this film.. i'm out.. I enjoyed the first film.. and I quite like Gaga.. a star is born is better than the original for me.. and also quite liked her in the american horror stories stuff..

but just wrong genre for a musical.... I mean.. why not do a musical friday the 13th.. or shawshank.. lol....
 
Some more reviews form the usual wide variety of places all giving a mixed bunch of reviews -

The Guardian - 3/5 - "There’s a real spark when Joker and Harley meet-uncute in the joint. But the whole movie finally turns out to be oppressively, claustrophobically and repetitively becalmed in that oddly unreal Gotham-universe jail with Phoenix and Gaga kept apart for long periods"

The BBC - 2/5 - "(Director) Phillips and his co-writer, Scott Silver, have decided to carry on with yet more of Fleck's backstory instead. It's a fascinating decision which bravely subverts audience expectations, but it does result in a film that is a dreary, underwhelming, unnecessary slog."

Deadline - "music lives inside Arthur waiting to get out, just as his alter ego bedecked in that clown makeup also was waiting to get out. In this movie, both happen — in a big way but very much in the fantasy world he has created"

The Hollywood Reporter - "even more than its predecessor, the sequel reduces the arch-villain to a hollowed-out product of childhood trauma and mental illness. Which means there’s little we didn’t learn last time."

Variety - "Phillips has made a movie in which Arthur really is just poor Arthur; he does nothing wrong and isn’t going to threaten anyone’s moral sensibilities."

The Times - 2/5 - "Phillips and co smashed back into the self-contained world, shook all the contents out on to the carpet and, against their own advice, had another go. The result? Messy, lifeless, derivative and exactly what you’d expect from a film that simply doesn’t want, or need, to exist."

https://archive.ph/vmW4X (no paywall version)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom